• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AGFA HEALTHCARE CORP IMPAX CV OUTBOUND (RESULTS MANAGEMENT 2.08)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AGFA HEALTHCARE CORP IMPAX CV OUTBOUND (RESULTS MANAGEMENT 2.08) Back to Search Results
Model Number IMPAX CV 2.08
Device Problem Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/13/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Agfa submitted mdr report #1225058-2010-00001 to the fda on june 7, 2010, for a site in the us.A 14th occurrence is being reported for the same issue/same device: impax cv results management administration tool (rmat).This is an internal discovery determined during the implementation of the associated problem correction plan, rmat verification, as reported in fda z-2112-10.Within this occurrence are 34 different study dates in which an individual mdr report will be submitted for each associated study date and medical record number/s (mrn) identified.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An agfa clinical analyst performed a retro-analysis and reported the findings to agfa service and agfa product quality manager.Agfa's investigation into this occurrence of rmat customizations has revealed that this specific change had the potential to introduce clinical inaccuracies in patient reports.Specifically: the original sentence of: "the mean gradient of the aortic valve is" has been changed to: "there is severe aortic stenosis".In this issue, the intent of the reading physician is to describe the mean gradient measurement would be added to the notes section although there is nothing in the diff or the summary to provide evidence for that assumption.The sentence change however, changes the original intent from quantifying the av mean gradient to indicating the severity as is severe.This change is different clinically and would not reflect the intent of the original reading cardiologist as the mean gradient might not clinically indicate a diagnosis of severe as and could lead to misdiagnosis and/or inappropriate treatment.Potential impact: if the change was made after reports had been generated with the original sentence selected, those reports prior to the change could display incorrect clinical data if viewed in rm or if used as a template for a repeat study on that patient.There has been no reported patient harm for this occurrence.A reportable correction is underway for this issue and has been reported to the fda via reference #z-2112-10.Agfa will follow the rmat post market verification work instructions to correct the sentence finding.Any further investigation for the site described in this report will be documented in the ongoing cfr part 806 reporting.(b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPAX CV OUTBOUND (RESULTS MANAGEMENT 2.08)
Manufacturer (Section D)
AGFA HEALTHCARE CORP
1 crosswind rd.
misquamicut RI 02891
Manufacturer Contact
deborah huff
10 south academy st
greenville, SC 29601
8644211754
MDR Report Key4681275
MDR Text Key5693004
Report Number1225058-2014-15454
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LLZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K050228
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/12/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberIMPAX CV 2.08
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/13/2014
Initial Date FDA Received12/12/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2002
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-