SORIN GROUP ITALIA S.R.L. - CRM FACILITY PARADYM; DEFIBRILLATOR, IMPLANTABLE, DUAL-CHAMBER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number PARADYM DR 8550 |
Device Problem
Low impedance (2285)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 04/03/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Reportedly, during a follow-up visit relative to the implanted icd system, the rv coil continuity of the icd lead was less than 200ohms and the svc coil continuity was 215ohms.It was indicated that there was also fluctuating and low ventricular lead impedance since around (b)(6) 2015.Furthermore, a stored episode, dated (b)(6) 2015, showed noise that was not inappropriately treated with shock therapy.An additional follow-up was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015 to perform echocardiography and x-ray examinations to exclude the possibility of a cardiac perforation.A re-intervention was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015.A preliminary investigation of the available patient files confirmed: fluctuations in the ventricular pacing impedance trend that started at the end of february; and oversensing in the recorded episodes dated (b)(6) 2015 that were characteristics of a potential lead issue.Recommendations in accordance with the isoline recall (issued in january 2013) have been provided.Following recommendations, a re-intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2015, no new noise was observed but still low coil impedance.The ventricular lead was capped and left in situ.The icd was also explanted and will be returned for analysis.A new system (ventricular icd lead and icd) was implanted and re-connected to the existing atrial lead.Note that the complaint relative to the lead was treated before in a separate document (refer report number: 1000165971-2015-00151) and that the subject complaint is related to the icd device.
|
|
Event Description
|
Reportedly, during a follow-up visit relative to the implanted icd system, the rv coil continuity of the icd lead was less than 200ohms and the svc coil continuity was 215ohms.It was indicated that there was also fluctuating and low ventricular lead impedance since around (b)(6) 2015.Furthermore, a stored episode, dated (b)(6) 2015, showed noise that was not inappropriately treated with shock therapy.An additional follow-up was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015 to perform echocardiography and x-ray examinations to exclude the possibility of a cardiac perforation.A re-intervention was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015.A preliminary investigation of the available patient files confirmed: fluctuations in the ventricular pacing impedance trend that started at the end of (b)(6); and oversensing in the recorded episodes dated (b)(6) 2015 that were characteristics of a potential lead issue.Recommendations in accordance with the isoline recall (issued in (b)(6) 2013) have been provided.Following recommendations, a re-intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2015, no new noise was observed but still low coil impedance.The ventricular lead was capped and left in situ.The icd was also explanted and will be returned for analysis.A new system (ventricular icd lead and icd) was implanted and re-connected to the existing atrial lead.Note that the complaint relative to the lead was treated before in a separate document (refer report number: 1000165971-2015-00151) and that the subject complaint is related to the icd device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Preliminary analysis of the returned device did not reveal any anomaly.
|
|
Event Description
|
Reportedly, during a follow-up visit relative to the implanted icd system, the rv coil continuity of the icd lead was less than 200ohms and the svc coil continuity was 215ohms.It was indicated that there was also fluctuating and low ventricular lead impedance since around (b)(6) 2015.Furthermore, a stored episode, dated (b)(6) 2015, showed noise that was not inappropriately treated with shock therapy.An additional follow-up was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015 to perform echocardiography and x-ray examinations to exclude the possibility of a cardiac perforation.A re-intervention was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015.A preliminary investigation of the available patient files confirmed: fluctuations in the ventricular pacing impedance trend that started at the end of (b)(6); and oversensing in the recorded episodes dated (b)(6) 2015 that were characteristics of a potential lead issue.Recommendations in accordance with the isoline recall (issued in january 2013) have been provided.Following recommendations, a re-intervention was performed on (b)(6) 2015, no new noise was observed but still low coil impedance.The ventricular lead was capped and left in situ.The icd was also explanted and will be returned for analysis.A new system (ventricular icd lead and icd) was implanted and re-connected to the existing atrial lead.Note that the complaint relative to the lead was treated before in a separate document (refer report number: 1000165971-2015-00151) and that the subject complaint is related to the icd device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|