The (b)(6) year old female patient was having an ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, stone removal and stent placement procedure.The stent was placed by the physician on (b)(6) 2015; however, it was later determined that the stent had tied itself in a knot in the renal pelvis of the kidney.They attempted to pull out the stent percutaneously on (b)(6) 2015 but was unsuccessful.The complaint device currently remains inside of the patient's body.An additional procedure will occur at later date to remove the stent.
|
(b)(4).Event evaluation: a review of complaint history, instructions for use (ifu), quality control, and specifications was conducted during the investigation.No product was returned for evaluation, therefore no physical examination could be completed.No evidence to suggest product was not manufactured to specifications.The ifu cautions to evaluate periodically via cystoscopic, radiographic, or ultrasonic means.It also cautions individual variations of interaction between stents and the urinary system are unpredictable.Improper handling can seriously weaken the stent.Do not force components during removal or replacement.Due to the device not being returned, a root cause can not be determined.Per the conclusion of quality engineering risk assessment, no further risk reduction is required.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
|
The (b)(6) year old female patient was having an ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, stone removal and stent placement procedure.The stent was placed by the physician on (b)(6) 2015; however, it was later determined that the stent had tied itself in a knot in the renal pelvis of the kidney.They attempted to pull out the stent percutaneously on (b)(6) 2015 but were unsuccessful.The complaint device currently remains inside of the patient's body.An additional procedure will occur at later date to remove the stent.
|