• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC KWART RETRO-INJECT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC KWART RETRO-INJECT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Knotted (1340)
Patient Problems Nonresorbable materials, unretrieved in body (2276); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/12/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The (b)(6) year old female patient was having an ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, stone removal and stent placement procedure.The stent was placed by the physician on (b)(6) 2015; however, it was later determined that the stent had tied itself in a knot in the renal pelvis of the kidney.They attempted to pull out the stent percutaneously on (b)(6) 2015 but was unsuccessful.The complaint device currently remains inside of the patient's body.An additional procedure will occur at later date to remove the stent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Event is still under investigation at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Event evaluation: a review of complaint history, instructions for use (ifu), quality control, and specifications was conducted during the investigation.No product was returned for evaluation, therefore no physical examination could be completed.No evidence to suggest product was not manufactured to specifications.The ifu cautions to evaluate periodically via cystoscopic, radiographic, or ultrasonic means.It also cautions individual variations of interaction between stents and the urinary system are unpredictable.Improper handling can seriously weaken the stent.Do not force components during removal or replacement.Due to the device not being returned, a root cause can not be determined.Per the conclusion of quality engineering risk assessment, no further risk reduction is required.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
 
Event Description
The (b)(6) year old female patient was having an ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, stone removal and stent placement procedure.The stent was placed by the physician on (b)(6) 2015; however, it was later determined that the stent had tied itself in a knot in the renal pelvis of the kidney.They attempted to pull out the stent percutaneously on (b)(6) 2015 but were unsuccessful.The complaint device currently remains inside of the patient's body.An additional procedure will occur at later date to remove the stent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
KWART RETRO-INJECT URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8128294891
MDR Report Key4685523
MDR Text Key5676625
Report Number1820334-2015-00199
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K082536
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberAQ-003600
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/12/2015
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/12/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/09/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age31 YR
-
-