COOK, INC. TURBO-JECT STANDARD POWER INJECTABLE PICC LINE PICC; LJS TURBO-JECT PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UPICDS-5.0-CT-NT-1110 |
Device Problem
Component(s), broken (1103)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/01/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
After placing a picc line in a (b)(6) year old female patient's arm, the tubing of one of the two lines broke.The picc line had been placed on (b)(6) 2015 for the passage of the glucidion, amikacine and tienam.The patient has multiple disabilities with her arms and the picc line often retracted.The tubing was therefore, often bent.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Product was returned in an opened and used condition.During investigation, a review of complaint history, quality control (qc) and instructions for use (ifu) was conducted.The visual inspection noted that the purple hub of the device was returned and had separated from the extension tube.The catheter shaft and extension tube were not returned with the hub.Per quality control spec, it is stated "confirm overall catheter assembly is clean and smooth." this product is shipped with an instructions for use which states warnings, precautions and instructions for use.The pt event info states: "the picc line had been placed on (b)(6), for the passage of the glucidion, amikacine and benam.The pt has multiple disabilities with her arms and the picc line often retracted.The tubing was therefore often bent." it is appropriate that the device was exposed to forces beyond its design causing this failure mode to occur.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment (qera), the addition of this complaint does not change the conclusion that no further risk reduction is required.
|
|
Event Description
|
After placing a picc line in a (b)(6) female pt's arm, the tubing of one of the two lines broke.The picc line had been placed on (b)(6) 2015 for the passage of the glaucidium, amikacin and tienam.The pt has multiple disabilities with her arms and the picc line often retracted.The tubing was therefore, often bent.The pt did not require any add'l procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the pt did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|