• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CAREFUSION UNKNOWN V. MUELLER DEVICE; FORCEPS, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CAREFUSION UNKNOWN V. MUELLER DEVICE; FORCEPS, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK - V. MUELLER
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 10/16/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
User facility medwatch #mw5038854 report stated " pean broke near the joint of the handle while clamping the umbilical cord.No injury to the patient but resulted in a cut to the physicians glove.Hand examined and no cut noted.Dates of use (b)(6) 2014" additional information received 07apr2015: the customer reported when the physician placed pean clamp on the cord on the placenta, pean broke at the bottom of the handle.The c-section procedure was completed as planned.The physician's glove was cut, contaminated glove removed.Further examination of hand no injury noted.The physician required no medical interventions, washed hand not injury, replace sterile gloves.No patient impact, x-rays obtained per protocol.Radiology review of x-ray and viewed by surgeon, no fragments noted.The reported product was a v.Mueller clamp, pean, artery, straight 6 1/2".Additional information received 08apr2015: the customer reported the x-ray was performed due to the broken instrument, to check for and rule out retained fragments.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4): if further information becomes available a follow up medwatch will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4): the complaint instrument was provided and an evaluation was performed by carefusion cuatomer advocacy.The instrument has no identified lot number and is likely over 25 years old.There is no complete product number or lot number etched on the instrument.There is however indication that this is a v.Mueller product.The ¿v.Mueller¿ stamp can be slightly identified.There is an alpha identification code pl stamped after the ¿v.Mueller¿ logo also.The origin of the ¿pl¿ marking was undetermined.The rfid origin on the device was also unknown.A supplier query was forwarded to the probable manufacturers along with the device and pictures.Manufacturing for this product could not confirm that the instrument was produced by either facility.The supplier and origin of manufacturing was undetermined.The investigation determined the cause of the break during procedure was most likely a crack already present near the proximal joint from the handle of the device before use.The crack appears to have been reprocessed several times noted by the buildup of oxidized material at the broken and exposed area of the arm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN V. MUELLER DEVICE
Type of Device
FORCEPS, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
CAREFUSION
75 north fairway drive
vernon hills IL 60061
Manufacturer (Section G)
CAREFUSION 2200 INC (ST. LOUIS)
5 sunnen dr
st. louis 63143
Manufacturer Contact
jill rittorno
75 north fairway drive
vernon hills, IL 60061
8473628056
MDR Report Key4697105
MDR Text Key5643172
Report Number1923569-2015-00017
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberUNK - V. MUELLER
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/19/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/16/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/05/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-