• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40 STEM 44MM NO 0; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40 STEM 44MM NO 0; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0580-1-440
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Pain (1994)
Event Date 06/26/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The letter from thompsons solicitors reported that on (b)(6) 2014, while the patient was at home, upon turning around he allegedly felt pain from his left hip.The pain allegedly got worse on (b)(6) 2014 and he attended a&e.He was asked to return on (b)(6) 2014 for a full x-ray.The x-ray was reported to reveal that the prosthetic component had fractured.The patient was scheduled for surgery on (b)(6) 2014 to have the hip replaced again but on trying to remove the original stem / rod, the femur was reported to have cracked.The patient allegedly had to have a longer stem and also two bands around the femur to strengthen it.The solicitor alleges that the cracking of the femur has resulted in prolonged recovery period, pain and discomfort.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The catalog number and lot code were not provided.The device was reported as an unknown exeter stem.The information in this report was provided by an attorney.No additional information is available at this time due to ongoing litigation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding crack/fracture involving an exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed.Method and results: device evaluation and results: not performed, the device was not returned to stryker.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: multiple factors have contributed to an overload condition around the proximal area of the exeter stem culminating in a fatigue fracture of the device.There is the proximal lateral cement mantle defect, the varus position of the stem increasing the jrf(joint reaction force) while the eccentric medial location of the stem in the canal contributes to weakening of the medial cement mantle all causing overload on the proximal stem section of a somewhat undersized and thereby weaker stem.Device history review: all devices in the reported lot were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event was a combination of a cement mantle defect and the varus position of an undersized stem resulting in an overload condition and fatigue fracture of the device.Further information such as return of the device, operative reports as well as patient history and follow-up notes would be helpful in completing a more comprehensive investigation.
 
Event Description
The letter from thompsons solicitors reported that on (b)(6) 2014, while the patient was at home, upon turning around he allegedly felt pain from his left hip.The pain allegedly got worse on (b)(6) 2014 and he attended a&e.He was asked to return on (b)(6) 2014 for a full x-ray.The x-ray was reported to reveal that the prosthetic component had fractured.The patient was scheduled for surgery on (b)(6) 2014 to have the hip replaced again but on trying to remove the original stem / rod, the femur was reported to have cracked.The patient allegedly had to have a longer stem and also two bands around the femur to strengthen it.The solicitor alleges that the cracking of the femur has resulted in prolonged recovery period, pain and discomfort.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXETER V40 STEM 44MM NO 0
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
Manufacturer Contact
beverly lima
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key4714841
MDR Text Key5664201
Report Number0002249697-2015-01316
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K121308
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2014
Device Catalogue Number0580-1-440
Device Lot NumberG2842112
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/28/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/21/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/11/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other; Required Intervention;
-
-