• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES HAGENDORF APPLICATION INSTRUMENT FOR STERNAL ZIPFIX; CERCLAGE FIXATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES HAGENDORF APPLICATION INSTRUMENT FOR STERNAL ZIPFIX; CERCLAGE FIXATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.501.080
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reported an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the application instrument trigger jams.When releasing the trigger the actuator feels something like a punch/ hit because of the jamming.The reported issue was detected before surgery.No patient was involved and the failure was detected before surgery.A substitute instrument was used for the surgery.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device was received.The investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.A review of the device history records has been requested.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: device history records was conducted.The report indicates that the: manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 13.Jan.2014, no ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The original date of awareness was inadvertently missing from the initial medwatch.April 7, 2015 has been populated in this field.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A product evaluation was performed, after the instrument was lubricated as per the manufacturer¿s instructions, the function of the instrument was fully restored and three implants could be tensioned and cut as per the design intent.A result of any design related deficiency the present article was analyzed for conformance to print specifications as well as the device history record was researched; no abnormal findings were identified.Manufacturing and inspection records indicated no problems with the lot in question.Based on these findings we conclude that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformances.The complained instrument has been forwarded to the product development site and we are now in the receipt of the investigation results; in this non-manufacturing complaint investigation it was found that the trigger of the instrument, as per the complaint description, did not always function freely.However, after the instrument was lubricated as per the manufacturer¿s instructions, the function of the instrument was fully restored and three implants could be tensioned and cut as per the design intent.The cause of the functional issue is related to the not preformed lubrication of the device by the user.No design related issues could be identified by product development.As no product fault could be detected, no further action is required.Dhr review no findings, chu evaluation, and visual check no findings; the trigger did not always function freely.After lubricate the instrument/trigger is fully functionally, pd evaluation, no findings.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APPLICATION INSTRUMENT FOR STERNAL ZIPFIX
Type of Device
CERCLAGE FIXATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES HAGENDORF
im bifang 6
hagendorf CH46 14
SZ  CH4614
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES HAGENDORF
im bifang 6
hagendorf CH46 14
SZ   CH4614
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4718709
MDR Text Key5585318
Report Number3003875359-2015-10179
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK110789
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03.501.080
Device Lot Number8789316
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/20/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/15/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/22/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/11/2015
06/23/2015
07/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/13/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-