• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 505DA18
Device Problem Entrapment of Device (1212)
Patient Problem Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 04/07/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that post implant of this mechanical aortic valve, the orifice of left coronary artery was blocked and a leaflet of this valve was immobilized by the heart tissue.This valve was explanted and a different valve was implanted.The procedure was completed successfully with no adverse patient effects reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product is being forwarded to medtronic's laboratory for evaluation.At this time no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Patient weight was not provided to medtronic.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received from the implanting physician that the blockage of the left coronary artery may have been due to the patient's physiology.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, the valve was received detached from the valve holder.Two unknown components were received with the valve and valve holder.The valve was discolored, showing evidence of blood contact.Both valve leaflets were intact.After the carbon subassembly was cleaned and dried, the leaflets were fully mobile.The tissue annulus diameter of the valve was measured within specification.During sewing cuff examination, the cuff met specifications.No as-manufactured surface finish anomalies were identified.The as-returned dimensions for the orifice met engineering drawing specification.The as-returned dimensions for the left leaflet met engineering drawing specification.The as-returned dimensions for the right leaflet met engineering drawing specification.The crown to notch (c-n) gap was measured; the as-returned gap for the left and right leaflets were within engineering drawing specification.The difference between the minimum circumscribed and maximum inscribed stiffening ring dimensions was within the engineering drawing specification.The reported issue of the coronary artery being blocked could not confirmed.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The serial number was verified to be correct.A conclusive cause of the reported immobile leaflet could not be determined as the device met specification.Based on the analysis, the complaint could not be confirmed and no evidence of a leaflet motion issue was noted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC AP
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4730837
MDR Text Key5705246
Report Number3008592544-2015-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/17/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/25/2020
Device Model Number505DA18
Device Catalogue Number505DA18
Device Lot Number618901
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/09/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/17/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/27/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
06/17/2015
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/18/2015
06/25/2015
09/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/27/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00076 YR
-
-