• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEROYAL INDUSTRIES UMBILICAL CORD CLAMP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEROYAL INDUSTRIES UMBILICAL CORD CLAMP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6833
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/05/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
When the clamp was placed on the baby the clamp slid off.Product purchased from professional hospital supply in a kit.Lot was not known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation findings: initial investigation: deroyal is the mfr of finished good 6833, umbilical cord clamp, which has a report of "when the clamp was placed on the baby, the clamp slid off".The bom was reviewed, on 06/12/2012, and raw material (b)(4) was identified.The raw material is a vendor supplied product.Confirmation on vendor needed prior to a scar being issued.Due to multiple vendors listed in the jde operating system, the qc complaint specialist requested assistance from the qc to identify the vendor.The qc reviewed the past products received in (b)(4).Determined the vendor was (b)(4).A car was issued on 06/14/2012.The vendor issued the completed car on 08/06/2012.In addition, the qc complaint specialist reviewed the 2010, 2011, and 2012 sales info and call history logs.Deroyal has sold (b)(4) each of raw material (b)(4), umbilical cord clamps.The call history log review found similar reports.Updated: a further review of the complaint has identified that the complaint will be required for updates.Deroyal regulatory department has been notified of the re-opening of the report; the sample was returned to deroyal and provided to (b)(4) for eval.This info is documented within the sample retrieval process of the initial complaint investigation worksheet; due to receiving (b)(4) during the investigation process of (b)(4) and had the same failure mode; therefore, (b)(4) was notified of the new event.The additional report, (b)(4), contained a lot number (the lot number was not identified for call (b)(4)); lot info was added to the deroyal plastics group problem analysis report and car response that was completed for call (b)(4); within the car response it is detailed that a design change was implemented in 06/2012 and approved through (b)(4).Deroyal also evaluated the clamp compression force of the device through validation protocol (b)(4) - comparative testing of cord clamp compression force.Refer to the validation protocol (b)(4); in addition, the 2013; 2014; and 2015 qfi logs were reviewed utilizing the keyword "umbilical" to identify if customer complaints have been received for the raw material (b)(4) or finished goods that contain the raw material.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UMBILICAL CORD CLAMP
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEROYAL INDUSTRIES
700 martin luther king, jr. blvd.
sanford FL 32771
Manufacturer Contact
200 debusk lane
powell, TN 37849
8643622333
MDR Report Key4732988
MDR Text Key5749353
Report Number1033554-2015-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/21/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number6833
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/09/2012
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date06/05/2012
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/11/2012
Initial Date FDA Received04/27/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-