• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION SPECTRA®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION SPECTRA®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number SC-8216-70
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Material Separation (1562); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction (1982); Pain (1994); Weakness (2145); Numbness (2415)
Event Date 04/07/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A report was received that the patient was experiencing increased thoracic and neck pain, weakness and numbness in good arm, and neurological deficit.The physician took series of scans and confirmed that the lead had moved down even further to the thoracic spine and that the body of the lead had completely separated from the lead tails in which he could only identify 13 contacts.The contacts had stacked on top of each other and appeared as one contact on imaging.The physician believed that the symptoms were device related due to the lead pulling down from the cervical region to upper thoracic spine.It was also suspected that the cause for neurological symptoms was the actual material of the migrated lead in the low cervical/high thoracic area.The lead had pulled out of the epidural space as confirmed by computerized tomography (ct) scans and x-rays.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the lead body and all 16 contacts were removed.The patient was doing well postoperatively and was discharged from the hospital.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The explanted body of the lead was not returned to bsn as it was discarded by the medical facility.It is indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history records will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental med watch will be filed.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient was experiencing increased thoracic and neck pain, weakness and numbness in good arm, and neurological deficit.The physician took series of scans and confirmed that the lead had moved down even further to the thoracic spine and that the body of the lead had completely separated from the lead tails in which he could only identify 13 contacts.The contacts had stacked on top of each other and appeared as one contact on imaging.The physician believed that the symptoms were device related due to the lead pulling down from the cervical region to upper thoracic spine.It was also suspected that the cause for neurological symptoms was the actual material of the migrated lead in the low cervical/high thoracic area.The lead had pulled out of the epidural space as confirmed by computerized tomography (ct) scans and x-rays.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the lead body and all 16 contacts were removed.The patient was doing well postoperatively and was discharged from the hospital.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that the patient will undergo an ipg explant procedure.Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: model #: sc-1132, serial #: (b)(4), description: precision spectra implantable pulse generator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that there will be no further course of action regarding the ipg explant at this time.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient was experiencing increased thoracic and neck pain, weakness and numbness in good arm, and neurological deficit.The physician took series of scans and confirmed that the lead had moved down even further to the thoracic spine and that the body of the lead had completely separated from the lead tails in which he could only identify 13 contacts.The contacts had stacked on top of each other and appeared as one contact on imaging.The physician believed that the symptoms were device related due to the lead pulling down from the cervical region to upper thoracic spine.It was also suspected that the cause for neurological symptoms was the actual material of the migrated lead in the low cervical/high thoracic area.The lead had pulled out of the epidural space as confirmed by computerized tomography (ct) scans and x-rays.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the lead body and all 16 contacts were removed.The patient was doing well postoperatively and was discharged from the hospital.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that the patient¿s ipg was explanted to appease the patient.No device malfunction was suspected.The patient was doing well postoperatively.The explanted ipg was not returned to bsn.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient was experiencing increased thoracic and neck pain, weakness and numbness in good arm, and neurological deficit.The physician took series of scans and confirmed that the lead had moved down even further to the thoracic spine and that the body of the lead had completely separated from the lead tails in which he could only identify 13 contacts.The contacts had stacked on top of each other and appeared as one contact on imaging.The physician believed that the symptoms were device related due to the lead pulling down from the cervical region to upper thoracic spine.It was also suspected that the cause for neurological symptoms was the actual material of the migrated lead in the low cervical/high thoracic area.The lead had pulled out of the epidural space as confirmed by computerized tomography (ct) scans and x-rays.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the lead body and all 16 contacts were removed.The patient was doing well postoperatively and was discharged from the hospital.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISION SPECTRA®
Type of Device
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
talar tahmasian
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
6619494863
MDR Report Key4734248
MDR Text Key18545819
Report Number3006630150-2015-01056
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
030017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/01/2012
Device Model NumberSC-8216-70
Other Device ID NumberM365SC8216700
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/16/2015
Initial Date FDA Received04/28/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/26/2015
08/04/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/15/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age21 YR
-
-