• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING Back to Search Results
Model Number D-1343-01-S
Device Problems Image Display Error/Artifact (1304); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/09/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a lasso nav variable eco catheter, and a visualization issue and noise occurred.Electrodes 13, 19, and 20 displayed black on the carto 3 system.In addition, there was noise from the electrodes that were being displayed on the carto 3 system and on the recording system.The catheter was replaced and the issue resolved.There was no patient consequence.This event was assessed as not reportable since these issues are highly detectable and posed low risk to the patient.When the product was received for analysis in the biosense webster (bwi) failure analysis lab, it was discovered that ring #13 was damaged.There was an opening found under ring #13 where internal wires could be seen when the catheter is bent.The spine cover was also twisted between ring #12 and ring #13.Upon request additional information was received on the returned catheter condition.The catheter looked normal upon insertion, as the physician made no mention of anything unusual.The physician decided to withdraw the catheter to replace it to resolve the noise issue and there was some difficulty in withdrawing the catheter into the sheath.The catheter was outside the right superior pulmonary vein, so no anatomical structures are there that the catheter could have become intertwined with.With a little extra force, the catheter was pulled back in to the sheath and then was removed smoothly from the patient.An 8.5fr agilis sheath was used for the lasso.The catheter was replaced and the afib ablation was successfully completed.The exposed wires at electrode 13 were noticed upon removal of the catheter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).Event description continuation: this finding is indicative of a reportable event because the exposed internal wires pose a risk to the patient.The awareness date for this record is (b)(6) 2015 because this is the date the product was received at bwi.After this date is when confirmation was received from the bwi representative that the condition was noticed prior to sending the catheter back.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) it was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a lasso nav variable eco catheter, and a visualization issue and noise occurred.The returned device was visually inspected upon receipt and it was found that the spine cover was twisted.Ring #13 was damaged with an opening and internal wires exposed which was why this complaint was reported to the fda.Further information received indicates that the exposed wires were noticed upon removal of the catheter.The received information also mentioned that there was some difficulty while withdrawing the catheter into the sheath when the noise was seen this might have contributed to the catheter damage.The catheter outer diameters were measured and it was found within specifications.The returned device was then evaluated for electrical resistance and current leakage and it failed on electrodes #13, #19 and #20.Further examination revealed that the lead wires for electrodes #13, #19 and #20 were broken causing the improper signal condition.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The customer complaint regarding a visualization issue has been verified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX  32599
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 3259 9
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
shahe garabedian
9098397362
MDR Report Key4751873
MDR Text Key5888927
Report Number9673241-2015-00265
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K113213
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2017
Device Model NumberD-1343-01-S
Device Catalogue NumberD134301
Device Lot Number17147289L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/20/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/09/2015
Initial Date FDA Received05/06/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/14/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/07/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-