Catalog Number 204000 |
Device Problems
Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/04/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The surgeon performed a partial knee arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio) and restoris multicompartmental knee (mck) implants.Towards the end of the case, the rio arm experienced joint motor errors.The resulting outcome of the case was successful and there was no harm to patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated at mako surgical.A mako field service engineer conducted on-site testing of the rio and was able to confirm the alleged failure of the robotic arm.The issue was resolved.A supplemental report will be filed if additional information is obtained in the future.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: the reported device was confirmed to be a j5 top assembly, p/n 200422, lot rob056.Device evaluation and results: according to gsp case (b)(4), the j5 motor returned from the field with hall errors.Device history review: review of the device history records indicate 1 robot arm that included the reported j5 top assembly was manufactured and accepted into final stock on 05/06/2009.Complaint history review: a review of complaints related to p/n 200422 on rob056 shows no other complaints related to the failure in this investigation.Tracking of complaints related to the 200422 part number will be tracked through quarterly trend request #767.Conclusions: the failure was confirmed during the inspection.
|
|
Event Description
|
The surgeon performed a partial knee arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio) and restoris multicompartmental knee (mck) implants.Towards the end of the case, the rio arm experienced joint motor errors.The resulting outcome of the case was successful and there was no harm to patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|