• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO XPS® BUR; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO XPS® BUR; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT Back to Search Results
Model Number 1885061HS
Device Problem Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Date 04/17/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Follow-up with the customer indicates that the blade was used at 12,000 rpm with irrigation as well as suction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow-up with the customer indicates that the blade was used at 12 ,000 rpm with irrigation as well as suction.G4.The new additional information was received on may 15, 2015.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a case, while using the bur with an m5 handpiece, the bur burned the patient's lip.Follow-up with the customer indicates that it was a second degree burn on the nasal floor and lip of the patient.Topical burn medication was administered to prevent infection and improve healing.The customer stated that they were done with the bur at that point so they did not need to replace the bur.The customer alleged the issue was only with the bur.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant products.1899200 ¿ m5 microdebrider; 510k number - k081277.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product analysis was completed on july 6, 2015.(b)(4): the product analysis indicates there was evidence of biological contaminants [based off of the reactivity with hydrogen peroxide].The distal tip and spiral wrap did not appear to be damaged.The biological contamination was cleaned from the bur.Quality engineer operated the bur using an ipc console and m5 handpiece.The result of the investigation performed indicates that the bur showed no overheating when operated at the recommended speed of 12k rpm.When the bur was operated at 30k, the bur was heating up at an approximate rate of 1c/sec.Temperature as high as 54c (34c originally) was recorded in 15-20 sec.Instructions for use warns customer that burs should not be operated at the speed higher than recommended speed.The bur label clearly states that this bur must be operated at less than 12k rpm.(b)(4): the handpiece was not returned.Therefore a product analysis was not performed.Method: actual device evaluated, visual inspection, labeling evaluation.Results: thermal problem; conclusion: use error caused or contributed to event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XPS® BUR
Type of Device
BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO
rd 31 km 24 hm 4
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC XOMED, INC.
6743 southpoint drive north
jacksonville FL 32216
Manufacturer Contact
uriza shums
6743 southpoint drive north
jacksonville, FL 32216
9043328405
MDR Report Key4765836
MDR Text Key5904030
Report Number3004209178-2015-08957
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EQJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/17/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/27/2022
Device Model Number1885061HS
Device Catalogue Number1885061HS
Device Lot NumberHG058JM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/06/2015
Initial Date FDA Received05/12/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
07/06/2015
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/09/2015
07/09/2015
09/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/27/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00040 YR
Patient Weight52
-
-