(b)(4).Method: the device was received for analysis.A visual inspection and a review of the device history record (dhr) were performed.Results: there are no testing results available as the investigation and evaluation are currently in progress.However, the dhr was reviewed for the lot number of the manufactured unit.There were no reworks, special conditions, or related nonconformance reports (ncrs) for this lot.The lot met the process specifications, including the quality control acceptance criteria prior to release.Conclusions: once the analysis and investigation are completed a follow-up report will be submitted.Information from this incident has been included in our product complaint and mdr trend reporting systems.Trend information is used to identify the need for additional investigations.
|
Methods: along with the previously reported methods, a microscopic inspection was performed.Results: a visual inspection found the pump returned full.The pinch clamps were opened and each select-a-flow (saf) infused at all selectable flow rates.The bladder did not have the same firmness as normal.The tubing was cut two inches distal to the blue connector in order to drain the medication.The tubing was bonded back together.A scissor was used to cut open the dust cover and a break in the inner latex membrane was visible.The leak was unable to be evaluated.A dremel tool was used to cut the snap caps off of the bladder.A scissor was used to cut away the remainder of the dust cover and the outer latex membrane.A break in the inner membrane was clearly visible after removing the outer latex membrane.The ruptured area was examined under magnification.The latex surface near the rupture had abrasive marks on it.There are areas of the latex membrane at the corners of the rupture where the material appears stretched or torn.Conclusions: the investigation summary concluded that the pump infused at both of the select-a-flow (saf)s for all selectable flow rates.The pump did not have the same firmness as normal.After draining the pump and opening the dust cover a break was observed in the inner latex membrane.Analysis of the membrane shows abrasions near the area of the rupture and stretching in the corners of the rupture.It was reported that the pump with a nominal fill volume of 600ml was filled to the maximum fill volume of 750ml.As previously reported, there was no patient contact and the incident was discovered during the filling process.The process review, which includes visual and functional inspections, indicates that the lot was manufactured according to approved procedures.As previously reported, the lot met the process specifications, including the quality control acceptance criteria prior to release.A quality alert of complaint and training to manufacturing personnel were performed.In addition, as a preventative measure, a scar has been opened and issued to our supplier to investigate this failure.Information from this incident has been included in our product complaint and mdr trend reporting systems.Trend information is used to identify the need for additional investigations.
|