• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/24/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was initially reported that during a shift check, it was observed that the battery connector inside the battery bay of the autopulse platform was damaged.No patient involvement was reported.No further information was provided.The autopulse platform was subsequently returned to zoll for investigation.During investigation, the platform exhibited a user advisory (ua) 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) fault.Although the customer did not report this, a ua 7 is considered a reportable malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform (s/n (b)(4)) was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Visual inspection was performed and the battery connector inside of the battery bay was damaged, thus confirming the reported complaint.Unrelated to the reported issue, the bottom enclosure, load plate cover, and battery latch lock were also found to have been damaged.From the condition of the platform, the damages appear to have been caused by normal wear and tear.Functional testing was performed and the platform displayed a user advisory 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) fault.Further inspection determined that the load cell modules were not functioning properly.Following replacement of the load cell modules, the device passed all functional testing.A review of the archive was performed and there were no user advisory codes observed on the reported event date.However, consistent with the observed ua 7 observed during functional testing, multiple ua 7 codes were seen on other dates.Based on the investigation, the parts identified for replacement were the battery connector, bottom enclosure, load plate cover, battery latch lock and load cell modules.In summary, the reported complaint of the physical damage to the battery connector was confirmed based on visual inspection and attributed to wear and tear.Unrelated to the reported complaint, the platform displayed a ua 7 during functional testing due to the load cell modules not functioning properly.Following replacement of the load cell modules, the platform passed functional testing.Following service, including replacement of the battery connector and load cell modules, the device passed all testing criteria.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key4773091
MDR Text Key18068844
Report Number3010617000-2015-00288
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/25/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Service and Testing Personnel
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0730
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/24/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/11/2015
Initial Date FDA Received05/14/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-