• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. TERUMO CDI 500 BLOOD PARAMETER MONITOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. TERUMO CDI 500 BLOOD PARAMETER MONITOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 500AHCT
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/23/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during use of the device for a cardiopulmonary bypass (cpb) procedure, the saturated venous oxygen (svo2) reading was not accurate on the blood parameter monitor (bpm).This issue has occurred since the recent notice of field correction (nfc) upgrade.The device was not changed out, as they recalibrated the unit and continued to use.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no delay, no blood loss, nor advance consequences to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per the clinical review on (b)(4) 2015: since this bpm unit was upgraded to 1.69 version software, the svo2 measure is much lower than expected and much lower than measured by a laboratory analyzer.The svo2 measure of the bpm is 15-20% points lower than the laboratory analyzer prior and at the first in-vivo calibration.The lower than expected svo2 is detected by the user, as the color of the venous blood in the cpb circuit does not represent this low measure.After the in-vivo calibration is performed, the bpm svo2 measure is closer to the laboratory analyzed value for the remainder of the procedure and is usually within +/- 5% units of the laboratory analyzer.Since the upgrade, the other measured parameters of both the hematocrit saturation module (h/sat) probe and the bpm shunt sensor have been in agreement with the laboratory analyzer.The cases have been completed successfully, without delay and without associated blood loss.There has been no harm observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During the laboratory evaluation, the product surveillance technician (pst) was unable to duplicate the reported issue since the pst could not duplicate customer¿s clinical setting.The monitor was sent to central engineering for further evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint was confirmed.This occurred after the 1.69 software update, which the addendum created for the update claims no accuracy unless both a gas calibration and in-vivo calibration are performed.No blood loop testing was determined necessary as the issue was due to pre in-vivo inaccuracies only.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TERUMO CDI 500 BLOOD PARAMETER MONITOR
Type of Device
CDI 500
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP.
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer Contact
jan winder
6200 jackson rd.
ann arbor, MI 48103
7346634145
MDR Report Key4777956
MDR Text Key5799465
Report Number1828100-2015-00403
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K972962
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,health professional,use
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/03/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number500AHCT
Device Catalogue Number500AHCT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/05/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/23/2015
Initial Date FDA Received05/14/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/29/2016
03/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Removal/Correction Number1828100-08/07/15-002-C
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-