• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HALYARD - IRVINE ON-Q PAIN RELIEF SYSTEM SILVERSOAKER 5IN(12.5CM): 270 ML, 4ML/HR (2+2 DUAL SITE); ELASTOMERIC PUMP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HALYARD - IRVINE ON-Q PAIN RELIEF SYSTEM SILVERSOAKER 5IN(12.5CM): 270 ML, 4ML/HR (2+2 DUAL SITE); ELASTOMERIC PUMP Back to Search Results
Model Number PS12505-A
Device Problems Split (2537); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/28/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Procedure: asku.Cathplace: asku.An international distributor reported that a facility in the (b)(6) had 2 catheters that broke on a dual catheter device.It was reported as follows: "part of catheter broke off" and "damage-tear off".No patient injury nor medical intervention was reported.Additional information was requested, however is not available at this time.The device is available for return and photographs were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Method: the device was received for analysis.A visual inspection and a review of the device history record (dhr) were performed.Results: there are no testing results available as the investigation and evaluation are currently in progress.However, the dhr was reviewed for the lot number of the manufactured unit.There were no reworks, special conditions, or related nonconformance reports (ncrs) for this lot.The lot met the process specifications, including the quality control acceptance criteria prior to release.Conclusions: once the analysis and investigation are completed a follow-up report will be submitted.Information from this incident has been included in our product complaint and mdr trend reporting systems.Trend information is used to identify the need for additional investigations.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Methods: along with the previously reported methods, a tensile strength test was performed.Results: a visual inspection found two silversoaker catheters returned for evaluation, each attached to a line of a dual line pump.Catheter #1: a visual inspection found the catheter returned in two pieces.The catheter was examined for signs of brittleness and none were found.The catheter was broken between the third and second catheter marking.A kink was found between the second and first catheter marking.A second kink was found at the beginning of the infusion segment and a third kink/partial break was near the distal tip of the catheter.A digital caliper was used to measure the catheter break which was approximately 0.630 inches distal to the third catheter marking.The diameter of the catheter at the third marking was measured at 0.041 inches.The diameter at the end of the tubing from the break at the side of the second marking was 0.040 inches.A second kink (beginning of infusion segment) measured approximately 0.201 inches distal do the second marking.The catheter diameter near the distal tip kink/partial break measured 0.039 inches.The ends of the catheter where the break occurred were examined under magnification.The break does not dissect directly across the catheter.The break occurred with the base section of the break having a larger diameter.The cut then runs diagonally across as the tubing decreases to one side.The remaining distal side of the break is a thin longitudinal section of the tubing.A portion of the catheters outer diameter is flat proximal to the break indicating that the catheter may have been cut with a sharp object as the tubing was in a loop or slightly curved.Catheter #2: a visual inspection found the catheter was returned in two pieces.The catheter was examined for signs of brittleness and none were found.A break was found between the first marking and the infusion segment marking.The diameter of the catheter section on the proximal side of the break was measured at 0.025 inches.The diameter of the catheter at the distal side was 0.034 inches.The catheter at the third marking was measured at 0.040 inches.The second marking was measured at 0.40 inches.At 0.816 inches distal to the second catheter marking the diameter changed to 0.0365 inches.The catheter diameter near the proximal tip measured 0.0255 inches.The catheter ends near the break were examined under magnification.Each end shows signs of the catheter being stretched.Tensile strength testing was performed on catheter #1.The result of the infusion segment was 4.27(lbf).The result of the mid-body segment was 8.81(ibf).Tensile strength testing was performed on catheter #2.The result of the infusion segment was 4.46(lbf).The result of the mid-body segment was 9.18(ibf).Conclusions: the investigation summary concluded that both catheters #1 & 2 met the tensile strength testing specifications.Based on the investigation the catheters were damaged, (likely due to excessive force) and cut (using a sharp object).For catheter #1 measurements of the catheter diameter indicate that the catheter was stretched starting distal to the second marking.The catheter's tubing edges indicates that a sharp object was used to cut the catheter.For catheter #2 measurements of the diameter indicate that the catheter was stretched at the infusion segment.Analysis of the broken catheter ends found signs that the catheter was pulled.Based on the investigation performed the complaint is considered confirmed.The instructions for use (ifu) provides a caution regarding catheter removal-if resistance is encountered or catheter stretches, stop.Continued pulling could break the catheter.It¿s advisable to cover the site with warm compresses, and wait 30 to 60 minutes, and try again.The patient¿s body movements may relieve the catheter to allow easier removal.Do not cut or forcefully remove catheter.As previously reported, the review of the device history record found that the lot met the process specifications, including the quality control acceptance criteria prior to release.An historical review indicated that no other complaints were reported for this reported incident and related to the same model number.A technical bulletin (mk-00021), tips for preventing in-situ catheter breakage, was sent to the customer.Information from this incident has been included in our product complaint and mdr trend reporting systems.Trend information is used to identify the need for additional investigations.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
Additional information was received on 06/03/2015.The incident was described as, "part of a catheter had to be retrieved from a patient following it breaking off on removal." the incident happened at the hospital.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ON-Q PAIN RELIEF SYSTEM SILVERSOAKER 5IN(12.5CM): 270 ML, 4ML/HR (2+2 DUAL SITE)
Type of Device
ELASTOMERIC PUMP
Manufacturer (Section D)
HALYARD - IRVINE
43 discovery
suite 100
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
AVENT S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
ave noruega edificio d-1b
fraccionamiento rubio
tijuana b.c., 22116
Manufacturer Contact
maria wagner
43 discovery
suite 100
irvine, CA 92618
9499232324
MDR Report Key4788610
MDR Text Key5880332
Report Number2026095-2015-00157
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MEB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
PK063530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/29/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2016
Device Model NumberPS12505-A
Device Catalogue Number101362100
Device Lot Number0201196017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/13/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/13/2015
Initial Date FDA Received05/21/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/19/2015
08/05/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/30/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
LEVOBUPIVACAINE 675MG
-
-