• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. (NSK) TI-SU03 GC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. (NSK) TI-SU03 GC Back to Search Results
Model Number TI-SU03 GC
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Entrapment of Device (1212)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This mdr is being reported at this time as part of our internal review of past complaints and service records.Due to the incident being in the past, we are limited in the info that we can obtain from the initial complainant.Event summary: according to the dentist, a bur detached from a handpiece during a treatment and the bur was stuck in the patient's gum.The dist did not inform nakanishi of the detailed info about the pt.Complaint review: there were no previous repairs on file for this handpiece.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: the handpiece was forwarded to the manufacturer (nakanishi) for an analysis on (b)(4) 2013.This event occurred in (b)(6) but the similar products are marketed in the us under k113655.Upon receipt from the dentist of the device involved in the mdr event, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device that included an attempt to measure the retention force of the operating device ((b)(4)).These activities are described in more detail below: methodology used: nakanishi examined the device history records for the subject ti-su03 gc (serial number (b)(4)).There were no problems observed during the manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.Nakanishi conducted a visual inspection of the returned device and performed a simple movement test.There were no visible abnormalities, such as cracks or debris, on the outside of the handpiece.Nakanishi measured bur detachment force by setting a test bur in the handpiece and confirmed it was 20.9n.Nakanishi's acceptance criteria for the bur detachment force is 22.0n or above, indicating that the bur detachment force of the subject handpiece had deteriorated.Nakanishi disassembled the handpiece to observe the inside of the chuck, compared to an unused new chuck and took photographs.Nakanishi observed the observed the accumulation of the dirt.Conclusion reached: the bur detached from the handpiece due to the deterioration of the bur retention torque that was caused by the accumulation of the dirt inside of the chuck.Nakanishi believes that there are two causes for the wear of the chuck: the handpiece had been used with the dirt and debris inside the chuck.The handpiece was used under the load and rotational speed that were higher than those specified with the retention capacity of the chuck.Nakanishi reminded the user of the instruction included in the user manual in order to prevent the dirt or debris accumulated inside the chuck.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TI-SU03 GC
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC. (NSK)
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322- 8666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISH, INC. (NSK)
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322- 8666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
ken block
1201 richardson dr.
ste 280
richardson, TX 75080
9727674325
MDR Report Key4805661
MDR Text Key21179506
Report Number9611253-2015-00066
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EFB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K962543
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Service Personnel
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/21/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberTI-SU03 GC
Device Catalogue NumberP058009
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/17/2013
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/17/2013
Initial Date FDA Received05/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-