Incident meets reporting criteria of an fda mdr report as the removal and replacement of the rms stents is viewed as surgical intervention to prevent a serious injury as the patient had developed hydroenphrosis.No device malfunction has been reported, the device not draining is interpreted as a performance related issue.1 x rms-060024-r stent of an unknown lot number was returned for evaluation.On evaluation of the returned stent it was noted to be the correct shape.A kink was observed on one of the pigtails, but the cirl senior manufacturing engineer commented that this was probably as a result of the removal of the stent possibly using forceps.There were no signs of encrustation or blockages present within the coils on the stent when they were examined visually by the cirl senior manufacturing engineer.The wells of both ends of the stent were cut off.The safety wire was present and intact.A wireguide was passed through the stent and resistance was met just as the exit of the curl.When the stent was cut at the blockage area it was confirmed that the stent was occluded.When the stent was examined under the microscope the cirl senior manufacturing engineer commented that the occluded matter had the texturing of encrustation/calcification.The complaint was confirmed as the stent was occluded.A definitive cause for the customer's complaint was unable to be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy or progression of disease state, cook ireland could not reproduce the actual conditions of device usage.A possible cause of the occlusion of the stent may be attributed to patient anatomy, treatment the patient was receiving or progression of disease.Resonance stent devices are used for temporary stenting of the ureter in adult patients with extrinsic ureteral obstruction.These devices are intended for one-time use.Prior to distribution all resonance stent devices are subject to visual inspections to ensure device integrity.The lot # of the resonance stent device involved in this complaint was not provided, therefore it was not possible to check the relevant manufacturing records.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|