• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 104; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 104; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 104
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/19/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Additional manufacturer narrative and/or corrected data; corrected data: the previously submitted mdr inadvertently did not include the udi.
 
Event Description
Analysis of the returned generator was completed.The battery voltage measured 2.722 volts (at ifi) during completion of the final electrical test.Bench testing indicated that the module was measuring the battery voltage correctly.Results of testing indicate that the battery voltage is at the low end of the specification.The cause of the low battery condition was not determined.Electrical test results showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a generator replacement for the patient, a new generator still in the sterile packaging showed neos=yes upon interrogation.System diagnostics were run and then the generator was re-interrogated which again showed neos=yes.The generator was reportedly not stored in a cold environment and felt to be at room temperature.Thus, a new generator was implanted instead.Programming data for the generator on the attempted implant date was received.Analysis of the data showed that the battery voltage read 3.369v during final manufacture test on (b)(6) 2015.However, on the date of implant ((b)(6) 2015) the battery voltage measurement showed 2.414v upon interrogation and then 2.426v following the system diagnostics, both of which would display an neos=yes message.The programming data showed that the measured temperature during these interrogations were around 10.9 to 12.6 degrees celsius.The generator showing neos=yes was received for analysis.However, an analysis has not been completed to date.
 
Event Description
Additional analysis of the generator battery was performed externally by the battery manufacturer, and the results of testing were returned.The open circuit voltage, mid-cell thickness, impedance and microcalorimetry measurements were all consistent with a near beginning of life cell.The cathode separator was thoroughly inspected twice at magnifications between 10x and 63x.No defects were noted in the cell assembly.The internal glass-to-metal seal was also thoroughly inspected.The cell exhibited an acceptable pin to lid resistance value of 50 gohms.Additionally, the header assembly passed the leak testing.No defects were identified during the destructive analysis that would account for the low battery voltage observed by the vns manufacturer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 104
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key4842175
MDR Text Key13970793
Report Number1644487-2015-04875
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative,oth
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/19/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/27/2017
Device Model Number104
Device Lot Number4315
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/22/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/10/2015
Initial Date FDA Received06/12/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/06/2015
07/10/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age62 YR
-
-