• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX¿ ESOPHAGEAL NG; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX¿ ESOPHAGEAL NG; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00513850
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/04/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Note: this report pertains to one of two devices used during the same procedure.Refer to manufacturer report # 3005099803-2015-01788 and 3005099803-2015-01789 for the associated device information.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that two ultraflex¿ esophageal ng stents were used to treat a malignant stricture in the esophagus during an esophageal stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, during the procedure the physician noted that the first ultraflex¿ esophageal ng stent (the subject of mfr report # 3005099803-2015-01788) would not cross the stenosis.The stent was removed without any issues and the physician dilated the stenosis with a cre balloon.After dilation a second attempt was made to cross the stenosis with the same ultraflex¿ esophageal ng stent, but was unsuccessful.During the second attempt, the physician noted that the dilation tip was bent.The device was removed again without any problems.An attempt was then made to use a shorter ultraflex stent (the subject of mfr report #3005099803-2015-01789), but the dilation tip also bent trying to cross through the stenosis.The device was removed without any issues.The physician chose to not attempt to place another stent at this time.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable and the patient was prescribed to receive medical palliative treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Exact patient age is unknown; however, the patient was reported to be over 18 years old.Reported event of tip bent.The device has been received for analysis; however, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A ultraflex¿ esophageal ng stent was returned for analysis; the stent was fully crocheted onto the returned device.No issues were noted with the profile of the crocheted section of the device.A bend was noted on the shaft proximal to where the stent was positioned.No issues were noted with profile of the tip.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.The investigation concluded that this complaint is associated with a product that meets design and manufacture specifications but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance of the device was limited.The most probable root cause classification is operational context.
 
Event Description
Note: this report pertains to one of two devices used during the same procedure.Refer to manufacturer report # 3005099803-2015-01788 and 3005099803-2015-01789 for the associated device information.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that two ultraflex esophageal ng stents were used to treat a malignant stricture in the esophagus during an esophageal stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, during the procedure the physician noted that the first ultraflex esophageal ng stent (the subject of mfr report # 3005099803-2015-01788) would not cross the stenosis.The stent was removed without any issues and the physician dilated the stenosis with a cre balloon.After dilation a second attempt was made to cross the stenosis with the same ultraflex esophageal ng stent, but was unsuccessful.During the second attempt, the physician noted that the dilation tip was bent.The device was removed again without any problems.An attempt was then made to use a shorter ultraflex stent (the subject of mfr report #3005099803-2015-01789), but the dilation tip also bent trying to cross through the stenosis.The device was removed without any issues.The physician chose to not attempt to place another stent at this time.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable and the patient was prescribed to receive medical palliative treatment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX¿ ESOPHAGEAL NG
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key4862294
MDR Text Key5850147
Report Number3005099803-2015-01789
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ESW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUY
PMA/PMN Number
K091816
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company represent
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/26/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date11/30/2016
Device Model NumberM00513850
Device Catalogue Number1385
Device Lot Number17500804
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/26/2015
Initial Date FDA Received06/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/10/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-