The pt had the device implanted during surgery on (b)(6) 2014 underneath a flap.On (b)(6) 2015 the pt returned because the wound had dehisced slightly.The doctor noticed a foul odor and that the wound began to tunnel, the wound was probed and a piece of tissue was removed.The removed material was evaluated.It was determined that the wound was infected and that the material removed appeared to be gauze.It is probable that the pt's condition (contamination/infection) and/or the residual gauze contributed/caused the device to fail.This occurred four months following surgery.The device instructions for use caution against use of the device in an infected surgical location.
|