Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Repair (1529); Implant, removal of (2320); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problems
Unspecified Infection (1930); Surgical procedure, additional (2564); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 05/26/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
A (b)(6) male patient undergoes surgery for removal of the main body graft due to disease progression.The aneurysm was still growing and the graft was possibly infected.The graft was only partially removed.The suprarenal bare metal stent was left in place.The explant was a re-intervention.The patient had open repair and his aorta was reconstructed with a sown in graft.The patient is recovering after the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Investigation- a review of the complaint history, instructions for use (ifu) and quality control (qc) was conducted for the purpose of this investigation.Product was not returned and photos were not provided.The attempts to contact the customer were not answered.The 4 years difference between the implant and explant date ((b)(6) 2011 - (b)(6) 2015) suggests that there was no problem with the implant sterility (otherwise this presumably infected graft would of probably manifested earlier).Probably the eventual infection of the graft was due to the patient condition and other associated disease (which might be of infectious nature).The ifu advises the healthcare provider to monitor the patient with a aaa graft implant: section 12.1: "patients should be counseled on the importance of adhering to the follow-up schedule, both during the first year and at yearly intervals thereafter.Physicians should evaluate patients on an individual basis and prescribe their follow-up relative to the needs and circumstances of each individual patient.".From the description of the event it looks like the patient was under constant monitor which allowed his physician to decide the best timing for explant.The conclusion is that most probably this event is due to the aneurysm growth and eventual patient infection so the root cause of this event is procedure related / patient condition related to occurrence.Instructions are in place to verify the device is manufactured within specifications.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.The risk remains acceptable per a quality engineer risk assessment conducted.No additional action is required at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
An (b)(6) male patient undergoes surgery for removal of the main body graft due to disease progression.The aneurysm was still growing and the graft was possibly infected.The graft was only partially removed.The suprarenal bare metal stent was left in place.The explant was a re-intervention.The patient had open repair and his aorta was reconstructed with a sown in graft.The patient is recovering after the procedure.No additional information has been provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|