• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HANCOCK II MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HANCOCK II MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 510
Device Problem Material Perforation (2205)
Patient Problem Discomfort (2330)
Event Date 05/28/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that two years and two months post implant of this bioprosthetic valve, the valve was explanted due to leaflet perforations, which caused patient discomfort.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight was requested but unavailable.Product analysis: the device was discarded by the customer, therefore, no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without return of the product, no definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the clinical observation.Should the device be returned or additional information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that this valve also exhibited mild paravalvular regurgitation.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Photos of the valves were sent to medtronic.A conclusive cause of the tear cannot be determined due to the quality of the photos.However, the photos suggest that host tissue / pannus formed a large lump in the location that the leaflet was flexing against, which could cause wear on the leaflet.Also, a light coating of pannus was noted on the leaflet (inflow side) above the hole.The pannus may have created a hinge point, with the leaflet flexing along the pannus rather than at the margin of attachment.This would exacerbate fatigue of the tissue at this location.The reported regurgitation is most likely due to the cuspal tear and perforation.The pannus overgrowth could be a potential cause of the cuspal tear.Pannus formation is an inherent risk of surgical valve replacement.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HANCOCK II MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4887831
MDR Text Key6066271
Report Number2025587-2015-00719
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P980043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/02/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/04/2017
Device Model Number510
Device Catalogue NumberT510C27
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/02/2015
Initial Date FDA Received07/02/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
07/02/2015
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/27/2015
09/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/28/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00063 YR
-
-