• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PROSURG INC SIGNATURE SERIES RF ELECTRODES; CUTTING LOOP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PROSURG INC SIGNATURE SERIES RF ELECTRODES; CUTTING LOOP Back to Search Results
Model Number 880-213
Device Problems Break (1069); Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Component Falling (1105); Device Inoperable (1663); Failure to Cut (2587)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/01/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Doctor was beginning a tur of bladder tumor and the resectoscope cutting loop was not working, it wasn't completely cutting through the tissue.The doctor took device out of bladder and found that the loop was broken.Doctor began again with second loop and had the same problem.The second time, however, the entire loop broke off and was later retrieved from the bladder.A third loop was opened but because of the patient's lack of muscle relaxation, doctor opted to complete the procedure using a cup biopsy forcep and bugby electrode.The manufacturer was contacted and a complaint reported.Cautery settings at the time were 180 pure cut, 85 coag.Our hospital's biomed tech took this machine out of service for evaluation.There was a similar situation with the resectoscope cutting loop in another case earlier in the week.Our hospital's biomed tech could not find anything out of the ordinary regarding the loops.Manufacturer boston scientific was notified of the issue with the loops.We have three photographs available pertaining to the incident if medsun would like to see those.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Lot #0115006 ((b)(4)) received a returned product sample back for technical analysis on 05/18/2015.The returned product sample shows that extreme force was applied by the end user.Device #2, lot #0115006 ((b)(4)) received a returned product sample back for technical analysis on 05/18/2015.The returned product sample shows that extreme force was applied by the end user.However the actual complaint was not received by prosurg until 07/01/2015.Device#3, lot# 0115006 ((b)(4)) prosurg did not receive any product sample back for this complaint for technical analysis.The complaint states that the product was disposed of by the hospital.The loop has been validated to withstand a 3 lb pull force.It is the rf energy which is designed to resect the tissue not the mechanical force applied by the end user.Based on the description of the event and the responses from the hospital nurse suggest that the bladder tumor was possibly fibrous or calcified not to allow soft tissue resection.Nurse's response "the nurse mentioned that it had more to do with the patient than the loop.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SIGNATURE SERIES RF ELECTRODES
Type of Device
CUTTING LOOP
Manufacturer (Section D)
PROSURG INC
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
2195 trade zone blvd
san jose, CA 95131
4089454040
MDR Report Key4898485
MDR Text Key6542543
Report Number3006789154-2015-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Unknown
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/01/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2018
Device Model Number880-213
Device Catalogue NumberM0068802131
Device Lot Number0115006
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/01/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/04/2015
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/04/2015
Initial Date FDA Received07/03/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age57 YR
-
-