It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation procedure with a carto 3 system and went into tachycardia which required a cardioversion.The patient¿s medical history is unknown.It was reported that the offset of the body surface (bs) electrocardiogram (ecg) signals was too large.V6 signal was at the same height as v5 signal on the carto ecg monitor.The offset did not interfere with the procedure.Additional information was received on the event.During the programmed stimulation the patient developed a hemodynamic unstable tachycardia.Overstimulation did not bring the sinus rhythm back, so an emergency cardioversion was done.Everything was working fine before the cardioversion, then after the cardioversion the noise on the bs started and it was not possible to get a read of the signal.There was noise on the bs ecg during the case.There was a complete signal loss due to the catheter but after the catheter was changed the signal returned but with noise.The signal interference was on the bs channel as well as the carto and recording system.However, the physician did have at least one ecg signal available to monitor the patient¿s heart rhythm.There is no further information about hospitalization or if any additional intervention was performed.This procedure was completed, however this noise issue caused a future case to be cancelled since the physician cannot work with those signals for a confidense case which required clear signals.
|