|
Model Number C4120 |
Device Problems
Mechanical Problem (1384); Sticking (1597)
|
Patient Problem
Bowel Perforation (2668)
|
Event Date 06/15/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Laparoscopic bowel resections- "one (b)(6), during a laparoscopic resection of small bowel, primary surgeon, dr.(b)(6) noticed a bowel perforation.Perforation was discovered while she was "running the bowel." the injury was attributed to the use of the applied medical's instruments (2) direct drive reposable graspers.Dr.(b)(6) noted that the tips of the instruments may have adhered to the bowel tissue even after the jaws were open, thus tearing the tissue when surgeon pulled away the instrument.Dr.(b)(6) noted that often tips of these graspers tend to be "sticky" and don't easily let go of the tissue, even though the jaws are open.As a result of this injury, perforated portion of the bowel needed to resected and re-anastomosed.To accomplish this more time was required, lengthening the time patient was under general anesthesia and surgeon needed to use more stapling devices to perform this repair." type of intervention- needed to do a bowel resection patient status- good.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The incident device anticipated to return.A follow-up report will be provided upon completion of investigation.In accordance to 21 cfr 803.56, if we obtain additional information, which was not known or was not available when the initial report was submitted, then the supplemental report will be submitted to the fda.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
We have tried to obtain the incident device for evaluation with no success.The incident product was not returned for evaluation.This is consistent with the complaint form which details that the product would not be returned.In the absence of the subject device, it is difficult to determine the root cause of the incident.A review of the manufacturing records indicates this lot passed all manufacturing and quality inspections.Engineering was unable to replicate the incident using a representative device from a different lot.Ultimately, the root cause could not be determined as engineering was unable to conduct an evaluation on the incident product.Although the exact root cause could not be confirmed, applied medical will continue to monitor its vigilance system for trends and take appropriate actions as necessary to ensure the performance and safety of our products.In accordance with 21 cfr 803.56, if additional information is obtained which was not known or was not available when this report was submitted, then a supplemental report will be submitted to the fda.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|