• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION SPECTRA®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION SPECTRA®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number SC-2218-70
Device Problems Bent (1059); Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291); Kinked (1339); Telemetry Discrepancy (1629)
Patient Problem Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Date 06/22/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A report was received that the patient had loss of stimulation.Database analysis revealed high impedances.A lead replacement was recommended.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: model #: sc-2218-70, serial #: (b)(4), description: linear st lead, 70cm.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: model #: sc-1132, serial #: (b)(4), description: precision spectra implantable pulse generator.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient had loss of stimulation.Database analysis revealed high impedances.A lead and ipg replacement was recommended.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that the patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the lead extensions, leads and ipg were replaced.The ipg was replaced per patient's request.During the revision procedure, when the leads were removed from the lead extensions, leads were visibly bent at proximal contacts.One of the leads was cut by the physician to avoid broken contacts from getting stuck in the body prior to explanting the lead.It was also reported that the physician was particularly concerned with the replaced lead extensions because the lead fracture was in the area of extension header/connector.The patient was doing well postoperatively.Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: model #: sc-3138-25, serial #: (b)(4), description: scs phiii ext 25cm.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient had loss of stimulation.Database analysis revealed high impedances.A lead and ipg replacement was recommended.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Sc-2218-70 (sn (b)(4)): device evaluation indicated that all eight cables were fractured at the bent/kinked sections of the lead body, at apparent clik anchor site about 10 centimeters from the proximal tip.No cables were exposed.In addition, e2 was fractured in the proximal array.Sc-2218-70 (sn (b)(4)): device evaluation indicated that the lead body was cut and 5 electrodes of the proximal tip were missing.All eight cables were fractured at the bent/kinked sections of the lead body, at apparent a click anchor site about 8 centimeters from the proximal tip.No cables were exposed.Sc-3138-25 (sn (b)(4)): device evaluation indicated that seven cables were fractured at the distal connector.Sc-3138-25 (sn (b)(4)): device evaluation indicated that the device passed all tests performed.Visual/x-ray inspections and continuity test were performed to ensure the device integrity.No anomalies were found.Sc-1132 (sn (b)(4)): device evaluation indicated that the device passed all tests performed.The complaint regarding that the patient cannot get the remote control to connect to the ipg was not verified.The device was linked to a test remote control and to a wand without any issues.The device profile indicated that the device charging and battery depletion were all normal prior to the explant procedure.The battery depletion rate and sleep current were within the expected range.There was no excessive battery depletion when the device was turned off.The ipg revealed no anomalies.However, the battery level dropped from 3.92 volts to 3.63 volts after the explant procedure.In the lab, the ipg was charged to 4.0 volts in one cycle.It was reported that electrocautery was used during the explant procedure.The sudden drop in voltage could not be duplicated after several charging and discharging cycles.Additional information was received that the contacts broke off after explant, but they were not left in the patient's body.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient had loss of stimulation.Database analysis revealed high impedances.A lead and ipg replacement was recommended.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISION SPECTRA®
Type of Device
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
talar tahmasian
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
6619494863
MDR Report Key4917207
MDR Text Key6052580
Report Number3006630150-2015-01769
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
030017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative,hea
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2016
Device Model NumberSC-2218-70
Other Device ID NumberM365SC2218700
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/20/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/23/2015
Initial Date FDA Received07/15/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/05/2015
11/17/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/04/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-