• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK, INC. ZENITH FLEX AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT BIFURCATED MAIN BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK, INC. ZENITH FLEX AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT BIFURCATED MAIN BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problems Other (for use when an appropriate patient code cannot be identified) (2200); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 06/04/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A (b)(6) male patient in the spiral-z post-market registry (11-015) had a proximal type i endoleak at the 12-month follow up visit (387 days post procedure).The patient was being treated for an aortic aneurysm with a maximum aortic aneurysm diameter of 5.2 cm.The proximal neck had an inverted funnel shape with partial plaque/thrombus.The left iliac artery had moderate tortuosity, moderate calcification, and no occlusive disease.The right iliac artery had mild tortuosity, mild calcification, and mild occlusive disease.The patient received a cook bifurcated 24 mm x 96 mm main body device, a 20 mm x 56 mm left iliac leg device and a 24 mm x 56 mm right iliac leg device.No iliac leg extension were used.There was no difficulty deploying any of the components.A molding balloon was used but no details were provided regarding its use.A main body extension was placed below the rental arteries, but no other details were provided regarding the device.No additional procedures were performed.At the conclusion of the procedure, the devices were patent with no external compression, flow-limiting kinks, endoleaks or thrombus.On (b)(6) 2014 (30 days post procedure), the patient was seen in follow-up.There had been no change in the size of the aneurysm.Devices were patent with no external compression, flow limiting kinks, thrombus, migration or endoleaks.On (b)(6) 2015 (123 days post-procedure), the patient was seen in follow-up.The aneurysm had expanded by greater than 5mm.Devices were patent with no external compression, flow limiting kinks, thrombus, or migration.A type i proximal endoleak was noted.No further information regarding the case has been provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Lot # is unknown as no lot # was provided.Exp.Date unknown as no lot # was provided.Udi # is unknown as no lot # was provided.(b)(4).Device manufacture date: unknown as no lot # was provided.Event evaluation: the device was not returned; however, a review of complaint history and instructions for use (ifu) was conducted during the investigation.Lot number information was not provided; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.No medical imaging was provided about the event.There is no evidence to suggest that the product was not manufactured to the correct specifications.The zenith device has completed design control requirements demonstrating that the device meets the predetermined requirements and that the requirements meet the needs of the user.Specifically, design verification testing included water permeability testing, migration resistance testing, and radial force testing.The results met the acceptance criteria.The ifu provides instructions for use, contraindications, warnings and precautions regarding the appropriate method of use.Specifically, it states "additional endovascular interventions or conversion to standard open surgical repair following initial endovascular repair should be considered for patients experiencing an enlarging aneurysm, unacceptable decrease in fixation length (vessel and component overlap) and/or endoleak.An increase in aneurysm size and/or persistent endoleak or migration may lead to aneurysm rupture.Patients experiencing reduced blood flow through the graft limb and/or leaks may be required to undergo secondary interventions or surgical procedures." additionally, it is noted that the patient presented with an inverted funnel shaped neck.The ifu specifically states "key anatomical elements that may affect successful exclusion of the aneurysm include [.] an inverted funnel shape (greater than 10% increase in diameter over 15 mm of proximal aortic neck length).[.] in the presence of anatomical limitations, a longer neck may be required to obtain adequate sealing and fixation.Irregular calcification and/or plaque may compromise the attachment and sealing at the fixation sites.Necks exhibiting these key anatomical elements may be more conducive to graft migration or endoleak." based on the available information, it is possible that patient anatomy contributed to the event, as the patient presented with an inverted funnel shape neck and required placement of a main body extension during the initial implantation procedure.However, without additional information including patient imaging, a definitive root cause cannot be established.The appropriate internal personnel will be notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
 
Event Description
(b)(6) yr-old male patient in the (b)(6) post-market registry had a proximal type i endoleak at the 12-month follow up visit (387 days post-procedure).The patient was being treated for an aortic aneurysm with a maximum aortic aneurysm diameter of 5.2 cm.The proximal neck had an inverted funnel shape with partial plaque/thrombus.The left iliac artery had moderate tortuosity, moderate calcification, and no occlusive disease.The right iliac artery had mild tortuosity, mild calcification, and mild occlusive disease.The patient received a cook bifurcated 24 mm x 96 mm main body device, a 20 mm x 56 mm left iliac leg device and a 24 mm x 56 mm right iliac leg device.No iliac leg extensions were used.There was no difficulty deploying any of the components.A molding balloon was used but no details were provided regarding its use.A main body extension was placed below the renal arteries, but no other details were provided regarding the device.No additional procedures were performed.At the conclusion of the procedure, the devices were patent with no external compression, flow-limiting kinks, endoleaks or thrombus.On (b)(6) 2014 (30 days post procedure), the patient was seen in follow-up.There had been no change in the size of the aneurysm.Devices were patent with no external compression, flow limiting kinks, thrombus, migration or endoleaks.On (b)(6) 2015 (123 days post-procedure), the patient was seen in follow-up.The aneurysm had expanded by > 5 mm.Devices were patent with no external compression, flow limiting kinks, thrombus, or migration.A type i proximal endoleak was noted.No further information regarding the case has been provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZENITH FLEX AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT BIFURCATED MAIN BODY
Type of Device
MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK, INC.
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key4929265
MDR Text Key15305063
Report Number1820334-2015-00407
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P020018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Study,Health Professional,health professional,stu
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/18/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberTFFB-24-96-ZT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date06/04/2015
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/19/2015
Initial Date FDA Received07/17/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/01/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
-
-