((b)(4)) the involved product has been returned to the manufacturer.Upon inspection, it appears that the graft does not correspond to the labeling text.Indeed, the graft is a knitted graft 20cm length and 12cm diameter (i.E.(b)(4) graft) while the labeling indicates an (b)(4) graft.((b)(4)) a review of the device history records and shipping records indicates that the most probable cause of the mismatch is an error occurring during the manufacturing process.The discrepancy should have been detected during the subsequent control steps.((b)(4)) the capa system has been initiated.The investigation determined that no other product was affected.
|