It was reported that during use of the device for a cardiopulmonary bypass procedure, the perfusionist (ccp) was seeing a difference of two degrees celsius (c) from blood parameter monitor (bpm) versus the patient temperature.The device was not changed out, as they continued to use for the case.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no delay, no blood loss, nor adverse consequences to the patient.Per the clinical review on (b)(6) 2015: per the manufacturer sales representative (sr), the reported issue is that the temperature measure of the bpm shunt sensor is about two degrees c different than the arterial blood temperature.Clinical services made the point to the sr and he has spoken to the perfusion team that the measured temperature in the shunt sensor will routinely be different than the temperature measurement at the oxygenator outlet.This is due to the distance between the oxygenator outlet and the shunt sensor.This concept is actually detailed in the instructions for use (ifu) in the troubleshooting section (section 9) with a note: "a shunt line will normally be different in temperature from the main arterial line temperature.Smaller diameter tubing and slower flow will increase the difference by allowing room temperature to affect the blood in the shunt line".After further conversation, it was discovered this behavior coincides with the 1.69 software upgrade and this behavior has been seen with all of their bpm units.The 1.69 software upgrade did have an update related to the temperature measurement algorithm.After further review, the perfusion team feels this is purely an observation and slight difference in temperature variation due to the software change.After discussion, they do not feel that a malfunction has occured.They continue to use their bpm units for all of their clinical cases.The cases have been completed successfully, without delay and without associated blood loss.There has been no harm observed.
|