• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problem Unable to Obtain Readings (1516)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/20/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id 3037, serial# (b)(4), product type: programmer, patient; product id 3 889-28, lot# va0wze9, implanted: (b)(6) 2015, product type: lead.(b)(4).Analysis of the ipg (s/n (b)(4)) found no significant anomaly, normal impedances were measured on all electrode pair combinations.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the surgeon replaced the lead and left the old implantable neurostimulator (ins) in the pocket.They then tested impedances with the old ins and the new lead and found that all of the case values were '???' which was tested at 2v and 3v.The rep then noted that they replaced the ins and plugged the new ins into the new lead.When they ran impedances, all values were >4000ohms.It was most likely a connection issue and the rep had the surgeon pull out the lead, wipe down, and reinsert.This resolved the impedance issue.It was unknown whether the ins was out of the pocket when the impedance testing was done as >4000ohms is to be expected when the ins is out of the pocket.This was when the old ins was being tested with the new lead.It was later confirmed that impedance testing was done with the ins in the pocket.The initial sutures had been placed and it was taken out to check to make sure the lead was all the way in, and the ins was replaced back into the pocket completely and the impedances were run again.The lead was replaced due to decreased symptom control.The patient stated that it worked initially but the therapy benefit decreased despite reprogramming.She had an uncomfortable sensation near her vagina.The physician recommended replacement after last attempted reprogramming.These reported adverse events are unknown to be resolved at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Additional information from the health care professional reported that the decreased symptom control and uncomfortable sensation in the pelvic floor was resolved.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key5005232
MDR Text Key23090031
Report Number3004209178-2015-16096
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 10/22/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2015
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/14/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/19/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/28/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00071 YR
-
-