Catalog Number 03.607.513 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 08/07/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device is an instrument and is not implanted or explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn as no product was received.Device history review: manufacturing location: (b)(4) - manufacturing date: april 28, 2015 no non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the tip of a cable cutter broke during a workshop being held for the customer.The device broke while cutting the cerclage wire.No patient or surgical involvement noted.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A product investigation was completed: the manufacturing documents of the front cutter in question were reviewed and no complaint related issues were found.The fracture face is homogenous, which indicates material conformity.Based on these findings we conclude that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformances.Our investigation has shown that the corner above the stopper on the side of the cutter is broken off.This corner is normally not exposed to any force during the cutting procedure and there is a clear gap between the stopper and the corner in the closed position of the front cutter.Therefore it is likely that a foreign body came between the stopper and corner what has led to the breakage.The cross section of the broken surface shows no irregularities; therefore, it is likely that too much mechanical force well beyond its calculated design has been applied during application, which resulted in the breakage of the corner.No product fault could be detected.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|