• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. TEC 6 PLUS; VAPORIZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. TEC 6 PLUS; VAPORIZER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Component Missing (2306)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 06/26/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Ge healthcare¿s investigation into the reported occurrence is still ongoing.A follow-up report will be issued when the investigation has been completed.Device evaluation anticipated, but not yet begun.
 
Event Description
The hospital reportedly noted one of the vaporizer interlock pins was missing.There was no report of patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The unit was returned to the manufacturing site for investigation.The unit was inspected, and it was noted that the interlock retaining screws were missing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TEC 6 PLUS
Type of Device
VAPORIZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DATEX-OHMEDA, INC.
3030 ohmeda drive
madison WI 53718
Manufacturer (Section G)
DATEX-OHMEDA, INC.
3030 ohmeda drive
madison WI 53718
Manufacturer Contact
john szalinski
540 w. northwest highway
barrington, IL 60010-3076
MDR Report Key5024476
MDR Text Key24690592
Report Number2112667-2015-00112
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K000275
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 06/26/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/24/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/09/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/1970
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-