Mitek medical affairs department discovered this published white paper detailing a historical event in which some mitek devices were implicated.It cannot be confirmed that this issue had been previously reported to mitek, so an adverse event report is being filed to document the experience described in the article.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, this file will remain receptive to any potential forthcoming information received that is pertinent and germane to this issue.Mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
This complaint was forwarded to mitek complaints by our medical affairs team who reviewed a journal article where mitek rigidfix cross pins were used for an acl reconstruction for a (b)(6) male.He had reconstruction surgery 9 years ago.Revision surgery was performed 4 years ago for a re-ruptured acl.A third re-vision surgery was done in another hospital.Within (b)(6), the patient experienced pain and swelling and was referred to a different hospital where emergency surgical exploration was performed.A greter saphenous vein autograft was harvested from the ipsilateral limb and a reanastomosis procedure was performed.(b)(4) knee surgery & related research popliteal artery pseudoaneurysm after anterior cruciate ligament re-revision using a rigidfix cross pin authors: gwang chul lee, md dong hwi kim, md sung-hae park, md.
|