• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO PT/INR TEST STRIPS; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. INRATIO PT/INR TEST STRIPS; PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST Back to Search Results
Model Number 100071
Device Problems Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456); Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); Unspecified Infection (1930); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/17/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation pending.
 
Event Description
The caller, patient's wife, alleged a variance between the inratio inr result in comparison to the poc inr results.The results were as follows: (b)(6) inratio inr=3.0.(b)(6) alternate poc inr=5.9, repeat 6.1.The patient self tester's therapeutic range is: 2.0-3.0.Other information provided by the patient self tester's wife, (b)(6): (b)(6) patient self tester (pst) injured leg on car door which created a hematoma.Pst taking antibiotics and pain medication.(b)(6) thinks last dose of antibiotics was week of (b)(6) however, cannot confirm.(b)(6) inratio = 3.0.(b)(6) pst given normal warfarin dose (6mg/day).(b)(6) and (b)(6) - withheld warfarin due to scheduled surgery.(b)(6) (b)(6) hospital - alternate poc = 5.9, repeat 6.1 (5 minutes, different hand).(b)(6) drs office alternate poc = 5.9 (b)(6) withheld warfarin due to alternate poc result.(b)(6) cataract surgery delayed due to inr result.No additional inratio results.(b)(6) pst admitted to hospital due to exacerbation of injury on leg.(b)(6) withheld warfarin dose.Inr in hospital.Dates and results unknown.(b)(6) hospital inr lab = 1.9 warfarin dose=5mg/day.(b)(6) warfarin dose=5mg/day.(b)(6) pst relocated to nursing home for care due to infection in wound.Pst started antibiotics.No inratio testing during this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: it is indicated that product is not returning for evaluation.Therefore, a review in-house testing was performed.In-house strip testing on the reported strip lot had met criteria.The product performed as expected.Although relevant non-conformances were noted in the batch record, they did not affect the final release specifications.There is no indication of a product deficiency and additional corrective actions were not required.Although improper techniques were identified in the complaint, root cause cannot be determined from the information provided.Based on the information available, there is no indication of a product deficiency.No corrective action is required at this time.
 
Event Description
It was noted that the patient self tester was milking the finger after the fingerstick and touching finger to sample well when applying sample.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INRATIO PT/INR TEST STRIPS
Type of Device
PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
9975 summers ridge rd.
san diego CA 92121
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
9975 summers ridge rd.
san diego CA 92121
Manufacturer Contact
ya-ling king
9975 summers ridge rd.
san diego, CA 92121
8588052084
MDR Report Key5030240
MDR Text Key24045547
Report Number2027969-2015-00623
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K092987
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,distributor
Reporter Occupation Patient
Report Date 07/29/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number100071
Device Lot Number365984A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/25/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-