• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX; BIFURCATED DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX; BIFURCATED DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number BA22-80/I20-40
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Hole In Material (1293); Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Failure of Implant (1924); Test Result (2695)
Event Date 07/27/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Endologix continues to investigate the reported event.Endologix will submit a supplemental report in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional information becomes available.Device remains implanted.
 
Event Description
It was reported the patient had a procedure on (b)(6) 2013 with a bifurcated device, and a suprarenal aortic extension.Reportedly, during a routine follow up a computed tomography scan revealed a type 3b endoleak.The physician elected to treat the patient with a bifurcated device, and endoleak resolved.The patient is in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based upon the clinical assessment, the reported type iiib endoleak was not confirmed although a secondary procedure was confirmed to reline the original implant.A type 11 endoleak was identified.A manufacturing record review was performed, the lot met all release criteria with no issues or deviations that would explain the reported event.The lot usage history showed all units have been consumed and no other units from this lot were involved in any similar event.The product labeling was reviewed and confirmed that the reported event is adequately captured in the existing labeling.Based upon the investigation, a root cause was not definitely identified.The clinical review identified the following factors that may have contributed to the patient outcome: multiple patent lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries; patient antiplatelet therapy (asa).Due to the lack of medical imaging, it is unk if the absence of renal blood flow was related to stent migration or some other factor.There was evidence to support an additional main body relining from an internal product forms.Multiple additional endovascular procedures and the placement of a non-endologix stent within the left common iliac artery at implant might also have challenged the integrity of the bifurcated stent.Although a design or manufacturing root cause identification was inconclusive.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Type of Device
BIFURCATED DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
henry to
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495984772
MDR Report Key5030406
MDR Text Key24047986
Report Number2031527-2015-00332
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 07/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date01/31/2014
Device Model NumberBA22-80/I20-40
Device Lot Number1091218-002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/25/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age87 YR
-
-