Model Number BA22-80/I20-40 |
Device Problems
Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Hole In Material (1293); Leak/Splash (1354)
|
Patient Problems
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Failure of Implant (1924); Test Result (2695)
|
Event Date 07/27/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Endologix continues to investigate the reported event.Endologix will submit a supplemental report in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional information becomes available.Device remains implanted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported the patient had a procedure on (b)(6) 2013 with a bifurcated device, and a suprarenal aortic extension.Reportedly, during a routine follow up a computed tomography scan revealed a type 3b endoleak.The physician elected to treat the patient with a bifurcated device, and endoleak resolved.The patient is in stable condition.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based upon the clinical assessment, the reported type iiib endoleak was not confirmed although a secondary procedure was confirmed to reline the original implant.A type 11 endoleak was identified.A manufacturing record review was performed, the lot met all release criteria with no issues or deviations that would explain the reported event.The lot usage history showed all units have been consumed and no other units from this lot were involved in any similar event.The product labeling was reviewed and confirmed that the reported event is adequately captured in the existing labeling.Based upon the investigation, a root cause was not definitely identified.The clinical review identified the following factors that may have contributed to the patient outcome: multiple patent lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries; patient antiplatelet therapy (asa).Due to the lack of medical imaging, it is unk if the absence of renal blood flow was related to stent migration or some other factor.There was evidence to support an additional main body relining from an internal product forms.Multiple additional endovascular procedures and the placement of a non-endologix stent within the left common iliac artery at implant might also have challenged the integrity of the bifurcated stent.Although a design or manufacturing root cause identification was inconclusive.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|