• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 105; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 105
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Date 09/11/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the vns patient underwent explant surgery on (b)(6) 2015 due to lack of efficacy.It was noted that the patient was developmental delayed and was hitting himself in the chest.The explanted generator and lead were returned to the manufacturer for analysis.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.The as-received internal device data showed that the last 25% change in the impedance value was estimated to have occurred on (b)(6) 2014, where the impedance value changed from high lead impedance to a normal limits range.Review of the available programming and diagnostic history showed normal diagnostic results through (b)(6) 2013.Analysis of the lead found that that the lead had not been fully inserted into the cavity of the generator.Complete analysis of the lead was reported in manufacturer report # 1644487-2015-05614.
 
Event Description
Follow-up was performed with the patient¿s neurologist.He was informed that product analysis found lead fractures and high impedance.He was not aware of any high impedance.System diagnostics were always within normal limits to his knowledge.The patient¿s mother was adamant that the device was not helping, but he did not agree.He programmed the device off in november 2014 and left the magnet on.At that time the impedance was 3980 ohms.The patient had a lower seizure frequency about a year after implant.He disabled the device in (b)(6) 2014 to prepare for explant in 2015 as requested by the patient¿s mother.His protocol is to leave the device off for 6 months to determine whether vns is actually helping the patient.Within 6 months of disabling the device, the patient started to experience drop seizures, which he has never had before.The neurologist maintained that vns was clearly helping the patient as the patient did not have a new seizure type in 14 years until vns was programmed off.He did not think the patient hitting himself was in any way related to the high impedance which was found, as the patient was hitting himself as soon as the device was implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 105
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5032067
MDR Text Key25013199
Report Number1644487-2015-05615
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Report Date 08/06/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2013
Device Model Number105
Device Lot Number3051
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/01/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/12/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age16 YR
-
-