• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 11010-29
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Inflation Problem (1310); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/05/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion in the subclavian artery with mild tortuosity, moderate calcification and 80% stenosis.An unspecified guide wire was advanced and crossed the target lesion.A 7.0x29 mm omni elite 35 over the wire (otw) peripheral stent system was advanced without resistance toward the target lesion, the stent system was partially inflated and the stent failed to deploy.There was no interaction of devices.The stent system was removed from the patient anatomy without issue and a non-abbott stent was used to treat the lesion.There was no adverse patient effect.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: (b)(4).The device was returned for evaluation with the stent dislodged.The reported inflation issue was confirmed.Partial stent deployment could not be confirmed as the stent was already dislodged from the balloon.Follow-up with the site determined that the stent dislodgement occurred during prep of the device for return.The stent movement was confirmed.Based on visual and functional analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.The investigation determined that the reported inflation issue and partial deployment appear to be due to the tears noted in the inner member.A conclusive cause for the tears was unable to be determined.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, there is no indication the issue was caused by, or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLONMEL, IRELAND REG# 9616693
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5033848
MDR Text Key24210828
Report Number2024168-2015-04880
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
P110043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Report Date 09/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2018
Device Catalogue Number11010-29
Device Lot Number5040341
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/09/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-