• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERS XX-SMALL, RIGHT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERS XX-SMALL, RIGHT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400250
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/07/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
Patient presented with ankle pain.Xray and ct showed cysts in the distal tibia.The talus component was pushed anterior.Operation- posterior incision to i & d the cyst in distal posterior tibia, back filled with allograft and hydroset, plated with two synthes distal tibia plates.Patient was flipped and anterior incision was made.The talus was revised by replacing and moving the component more posterior to set under the tibia.The poly was exchanged and a tal was preformed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The talar component and the sliding core were classified as primary products during investigation.No deviations were found during review of the manufacturing and inspection documents (dhr).The implants were documented as faultless prior to distribution.The implants, provided to the external lab exponent, show signs of usage but no significant damages.Furthermore the surgeon stated that the implants were not damaged during revision.Thus, a manufacturing issue can be excluded.The reported cysts were confirmed via the provided x-rays and during review of the surgery notes.Cysts were already evaluated by a hcp in the statement ¿clinical results of the star ankle prosthesis, page 70, 71¿: ¿cyst formation (bone resorption) (0 ¿ 16 %) [1, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 17, 20, 24, 27, 28, 30] spontaneous bone resorption and cyst formation represents a significant problem in ankle arthroplasty.The symptoms may be mild and will not require specific surgical measures, but in many cases revision surgery with bone grafting may be required.In advanced cases cyst formation may cause a collapse of the arthroplasty requiring implant removal and ankle fusion.¿ additionally the case was evaluated by a product expert from the development department: ¿this is a known complication and risk in the scientific literature.The exact source is unknown.Researchers believe that it is due to poly wear debris and/or fluid hydraulic pressure in the joint.¿ nevertheless, osteolysis and/or other periprosthetic bone loss (like cysts) are adverse effects and may require medical or surgical intervention (therefore listed in the ifu).Conclusion: based on the evaluation a manufacturing fault was not found but a correlation between the implants and the found cysts cannot be excluded.The case represents a recurring issue for the sliding core and will be monitored and evaluated according to pms trending procedure dqi 13-004.As an additional issue it was found that the complained talar component was already expired at the time of implantation.Also pre-operative swelling was reported no infection occurred according to the customer.Most likely the talar component was re-sterilized prior to implantation.Discrepancies were detected during risk analysis review; nc#937715 was already initiated.No other non-conformity identified; no previous or actual actions are in place.
 
Event Description
Patient presented with ankle pain.Xray and ct showed cysts in the distal tibia.The talus component was pushed anterior.Operation- posterior incision to i & d the cyst in distal posterior tibia, back filled with allograft and hydroset, plated with two synthes distal tibia plates.Patient was flipped and anterior incision was made.The talus was revised by replacing and moving the component more posterior to set under the tibia.The poly was exchanged and a tal was preformed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERS XX-SMALL, RIGHT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
CH  2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
CH   2545
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5038460
MDR Text Key24378861
Report Number0008031020-2015-00365
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTG
UDI-Device Identifier00886385016412
UDI-Public00886385016412
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050050
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 08/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2009
Device Catalogue Number400250
Device Lot Number021126/1584
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/11/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/28/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/05/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2004
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
-
-