Though no medical/surgical intervention was required to preclude a serious injury in this event, there have been previously reported events involving a similar device that resulted in the need for medical/surgical intervention to preclude permanent damage to a body structure or permanent impairment of a body function.Therefore, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.As received, the handpiece could support the reported complaint however, a root cause could not be determined.Production and quality testing of the handpiece was not performed as the device was not in working condition.Multiple dimensions on the head were checked by production personnel.The handpiece was then microscopically evaluated by quality personnel.Microscopic evaluation revealed significant debris within the head cavity.Some rubbing marks were also seen within the head cavity.The evaluation also revealed damage to the rotor blades.The bur end bearing was loose.Loose bearing plus the use of a large headed bur could have increased vibration within the head cavity due to an already unstable set assembly, causing the cap to unscrew but this could not be confirmed.
|