Catalog Number 04.607.402 |
Device Problem
Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 07/17/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There was no patient involvement.Device was not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.(b)(4).Manufacturing date: march 21, 2007.This article consists of two components (body and ring).No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: the locking ring, should be attached to the 3d head, but it was separated.This was noticed during the cleaning and sterilization cycle.Implant was removed from set.It appears that the locking ring is smaller than other items within the same article number.There was no patient/surgery involvement.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A manufacturing evaluation was completed: part received not in the original not sterile packaging.Part is disassembled in the two components.The two components have been re-inspected for all the features pertinent to the complaint condition with the conclusion that all relevant measurable features meet specification.Two relevant features cannot be measured because they are damaged by assembling process (features not measurable after assembling).This complaint is disposed as confirmed due to the fact the returned item is disassembled.Considering that it was not possible to re-inspect all the relevant features the issue is considered indeterminate.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The involved part has been assembled in 2007 according to the procedure which requires that after assembling the operator verifies that the body can rotate within the locking-ring and that the two components do not disassemble.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|