• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problems Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem Embolism (1829)
Event Date 08/19/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Unique device identifier (udi): the udi is unknown because the part number and lot number were not provided.The stent remains in the vessel.It is indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.The investigation determined the reported difficulties and treatment appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.The patient effect of embolism is a known and potential patient effect as listed in the omnilink elite electronic instructions for use.Although a conclusive cause and a relationship between the reported patient effect of embolism and the product, if any, cannot be determined, there is no indication that the issue is related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.The supera sds referenced is filed under mfr report# 2024168-2015-05328.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2015 two omnilink elite stents were deployed in the total occlusion of the common iliac and external iliac lesions without issue.The patient was admitted overnight due to distal clots and was administered tissue plasminogen activator (tpa).On (b)(6) 2015 a supera stent was implanted in the proximal superficial femoral artery.While retracting the stent delivery system (sds) over the command guide wire, resistance was noted at the distal tip of the sds sheath.While viewing angiographically, something 'snapped' and the tip became separated, but remained on the guide wire.The sds was retracted and the tip was removed; however, it was suspected that the sds tip may have caught on a stent strut of the implanted omnilink elite stent, causing damage to the stent strut.A 7 x 29 mm omnilink stent was deployed, covering the damaged stent strut to allow flow.Post procedure the vessel result was noted as very good and the patient condition was good.There was no reported adverse patient sequela.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OMNILINK ELITE PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5078095
MDR Text Key25833395
Report Number2024168-2015-05350
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P110043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/20/2015
Initial Date FDA Received09/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient Weight79
-
-