• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORNIER, INC. PRIMUS FLEXIBLE GREAT TOE WITH GROMMETS IMPLANT (FGT); TOE PROSTHESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORNIER, INC. PRIMUS FLEXIBLE GREAT TOE WITH GROMMETS IMPLANT (FGT); TOE PROSTHESIS Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 08/24/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This is the initial report submitted regarding this surgical event and medical device.
 
Event Description
On or about (b)(6) 2007 (b)(6) (the patient) presented to (b)(6) centers and dr.(b)(6) for treatment and evaluation of her right foot pain.Sometime prior to (b)(6) 2011 (b)(6) developed osteoarthritis in her right foot.On or about (b)(6) 2011 dr.(b)(6) recommended that (b)(6) undergo an austin bunionectomy with possible first metatarsal phalangeal joint implant - right foot using the product.On or about (b)(6) 2011 (b)(6) was admitted to (b)(6) for performance of the surgical procedure by dr.(b)(6).On or about (b)(6) 2011 dr.(b)(6) performed the surgical procedure on (b)(6) at (b)(6) and implanted the fgt implant into (b)(6) right foot.On or about (b)(6) 2013 janet presented to (b)(6) centers and dr.(b)(6) for post-operative follow up care of her right foot and complained of right foot pain at the top of her first metatarsal phalangeal joint since (b)(6) 2013.At this time dr.(b)(6) conducted a physical examination of (b)(6) right foot, ordered and reviewed x-rays of (b)(6) right foot and interpreted said x-rays as indicating a possible fracture of the bone in (b)(6) right foot around the product.On or about (b)(6) 2013 (b)(6) presented to the offices of (b)(6) centers and dr.(b)(6) for post operative follow up care with continuing complaints of right foot plain, she was seen and examined by dr.(b)(6) and dr.(b)(6) recommended that (b)(6) undergo a bony resection around the product with possible replacement of the product (a second surgical procedure).On or about (b)(6) 2013 (b)(6) was admitted to (b)(6) for the performance of a second surgery by dr.(b)(6).On (b)(6) 2013 dr.(b)(6) performed the second surgery on (b)(6) and removed the product and replaced it with another futura primus flexible great toe implant (this incident has already been reported to the fda under mdr number 3004983210-2013-00021) on (b)(6) 2014 (b)(6) presented to (b)(6) complaining of right foot pain.On or about (b)(6) 2014 dr.(b)(6) surgically removed the product and performed a fusion of (b)(6) first matatarsalphalangeal joint with plates and screws (a third surgery, and the second time (b)(6) had the original surgery revised).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is the final report submitted regarding this surgical event and medical device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRIMUS FLEXIBLE GREAT TOE WITH GROMMETS IMPLANT (FGT)
Type of Device
TOE PROSTHESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORNIER, INC.
10801 nesbitt ave south
bloomington MN 55437
Manufacturer (Section G)
TORNIER, INC
10801 nesbitt ave south
bloomington MN 55437
Manufacturer Contact
kevin smith
10801 nesbitt ave south
bloomington, MN 55437
9529217121
MDR Report Key5085203
MDR Text Key26113107
Report Number3004983210-2015-00038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K981194
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 09/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received09/17/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/16/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-