Model Number 105 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Bruise/Contusion (1754); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Staphylococcus Aureus (2058); Seroma (2069); Swelling (2091)
|
Event Date 04/20/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
During patient's first follow up appointment after vns implant surgery on (b)(6) 2015, bruising was observed around the generator incision site.No physical trauma is suspected to have occurred to the site.Patient was sent for labs and was referred to a surgeon for second opinion.The patient's bruising was reported to be abnormal and the cause was unclear.It was also reported that the patient had a (b)(6) infection prior to this implant surgery in the chest area and so the patient was referred for a second consult.On (b)(6) 2015, swelling was observed near the incision site but there was no redness or warmth.No interventions were taken and patient was asked to follow up in a few weeks.Additional information was received that the patient has a seroma around the generator pocket, pain in the chest and some significant bruising.Patient is to undergo a generator pocket revision surgery but no known surgical interventions has occurred to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
A pocket revision was planned for the seroma but patient underwent full explant on (b)(6) 2015 due to infection on the generator side.Patient was given antibiotics and neurologist was informed to increase medications.The explanted devices are expected to be returned but have not been received.A review of device history records showed that both the lead and generator were sterilized prior to distribution.
|
|
Event Description
|
The generator and lead were received on 12/01/2015.Analysis is underway but has not been completed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Describe event or problem, corrected data: analysis of the generator was completed on 12/22/2015.Previous supplemental mdr #2 was submitted prior to the completion of the generator analysis on 12/22/2015.
|
|
Event Description
|
Analysis was completed for the generator and lead.In the (b)(4) lab, the generator output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator's output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.The septum was not cored, thus eliminating the possibility of a potential unintended electrical current path through body fluids.Furthermore, a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The battery, 3.002 volts, shows an ifi=no condition.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Since a portion of the lead (including the electrode array) was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.The outer silicone tubing has an abraded opening.Other than the above mentioned observation and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portion.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|