• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX SA VIDAS® RUB IGG II ASSAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX SA VIDAS® RUB IGG II ASSAY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 30221
Device Problem False Negative Result (1225)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/11/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
A customer in (b)(6) reported a false negative result associated with the vidas® rub igg ii assay ((b)(4)).The customer obtained a negative result on vidas® (7 ui/ml) on (b)(6) 2015 for a pregnant woman with the vidas® rub igg lot 1003788010 (expiration date 18-jan-2016).The technique cobas gave a positive result at 17.41 on the same sample.The patient is a pregnant woman at (b)(6) of pregnancy.The customer repeated the same sample on (b)(6) 2015 using the kit vidas® rub igg lot 1003903030 (expiration date 16-mar-2016) and the result was still negative at 7 ui/ml.The clinician did not agree with these results because the patient was vaccinated.The vidas rub igg ii ((b)(4)) is not sold in the us; however, a similar product vidas® rub igg ((b)(4)) is sold.There is no indication or report from the hospital or treating physician to biomerieux that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to a patient's state of health.Culture submittal has been requested by biomerieux for internal investigation.Biomerieux internal investigation will be conducted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Biomérieux investigation was conducted.No sample was submitted by the customer.Evaluation of the vidas® rubella igg ii (lot 1003903030) indicates no anomaly identified during manufacturing qc.There was no non-conformity related to the customer's issue.Internal qc samples (positive and equivocal) were tested with retain kits of the customer lot.Kit performance was in accordance with specifications.It seems that there is anti-rubella ab in the serum, but with a rate below the vidas® system's technical detection threshold.The package insert for vidas® rbg ii indicates sensitivity is not 100%, evidenced in the following excerpt : "relative sensitivity was established for each study in comparison with two commercialized reagents.Study a: sensitivity: 97.87% (95 % confidence interval: 94.57% - 99.18%).Study b: sensitivity: 95.45% (95% confidence interval: 91.74% - 97.54%).Since a few rare cases of reinfection with rubella have been reported in previously vaccinated or infected women, certain authors have suggested revaccinating subjects at risk when the level of anti-rubella igg is less than 25 iu/ml.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VIDAS® RUB IGG II ASSAY
Type of Device
VIDAS® RUB IGG II ASSAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX SA
chemin de l orme
marcy l etoile, rhone 69280
FR  69280
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX SA
chemin de l orme
marcy l etoile, rhone 69280
PO   69280
Manufacturer Contact
ryan lemelle
595 anglum road
hazelwood, MO 63042
3147318582
MDR Report Key5111728
MDR Text Key27067373
Report Number3002769706-2015-00107
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LFX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePO
PMA/PMN Number
K080766
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 09/14/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/18/2016
Device Catalogue Number30221
Device Lot Number1003788010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received09/29/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/25/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-