Catalog Number 03.010.411 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Metal Shedding Debris (1804)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information was not provided by reporter.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(4).Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reported an event the (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that a patient underwent a surgical procedure for a proximal femoral nail antirotation (pfna) blade to be removed.The reported pfna impactor instrument that was utilized was broken prior to the procedure, with screw-like threads present on the end of the device.As a result, the pfna blade could not be removed.The patient was closed up and underwent a separate procedure on another date with a complete loan-set.The pfna impactor used for this procedure had previously been returned to the manufacturer for inspection.The inspection of the device did not capture the threads, which allowed for the device to be prematurely returned to the customer and ultimately used for a case.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial reporter: phone number: (b)(6) a product investigation was completed: the investigation has shown that the threaded tip of the extraction screw is broken off as complained.Unfortunately, the specific clinical situation at the time of breakage is not known.The review of the production histories revealed that this instrument was manufactured in september 2013 according to the specifications.The parts conformed to dimensional specifications at the time of manufacturing and passed inspection requirements.No manufacturing related issues that would have contributed to this complaint were found.On the returned instrument the relevant dimensions could not be measured due to the damage incurred.Since the information given did not provide sufficient evidence the cause of failure could not definitely be determined; however, a material or manufacturing related issue can be excluded.There was no indication for material or design related issue.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|