Model Number 102 |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Tingling (2171); Dysphasia (2195); Discomfort (2330)
|
Event Date 09/05/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient was experiencing erratic stimulation constantly and tingling pain at neck/clavicle area.Diagnostics were performed and were within normal limits.The patient¿s generator was programmed off, but the pain persisted.The (b)(6) wants the device replaced due to the issue.The device remained programmed off.Per clinic notes from (b)(6) when the patient followed-up with her physician, the patient was seen in the hospital with pain in her neck and throat.The device stimulation caused ¿intense pain¿ in her throat.The patient was unable to speak and felt as if the device was ¿squeezing¿ her throat.After the device was programmed off, the patient reported that the squeezing sensation in her throat became ¿unacceptable stinging in the left neck¿.The magnet was taped to the patient in the hospital to stop the stimulation, but was unsuccessful.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient had generator replacement on (b)(6) 2015 due to pain.The explanted device was received by the manufacturer.However, analysis has not been completed to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Analysis was completed on the generator.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator's output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.Magnet activations performed during output monitoring (at a distance of one-inch, spacer block, from generator), demonstrate the appropriate magnet output for the programmed settings.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was later received that near the time of the initial event, the patient was undergoing a procedure unrelated to vns when an anesthesiologist noticed some spots on her throat and referred her to an ent physician.The patient saw the ent physician sometime near (b)(6) 2015 and noticed that her vocal cords were not opening or closing like they were supposed to.Patient did not have any symptoms from this event.The ent physician did not take any intervention for this and told patient to come back in 6 months for a checkup.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|