• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Tingling (2171); Dysphasia (2195); Discomfort (2330)
Event Date 09/05/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient was experiencing erratic stimulation constantly and tingling pain at neck/clavicle area.Diagnostics were performed and were within normal limits.The patient¿s generator was programmed off, but the pain persisted.The (b)(6) wants the device replaced due to the issue.The device remained programmed off.Per clinic notes from (b)(6) when the patient followed-up with her physician, the patient was seen in the hospital with pain in her neck and throat.The device stimulation caused ¿intense pain¿ in her throat.The patient was unable to speak and felt as if the device was ¿squeezing¿ her throat.After the device was programmed off, the patient reported that the squeezing sensation in her throat became ¿unacceptable stinging in the left neck¿.The magnet was taped to the patient in the hospital to stop the stimulation, but was unsuccessful.
 
Event Description
The patient had generator replacement on (b)(6) 2015 due to pain.The explanted device was received by the manufacturer.However, analysis has not been completed to date.
 
Event Description
Analysis was completed on the generator.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs, while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator's output signal and demonstrated that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.Magnet activations performed during output monitoring (at a distance of one-inch, spacer block, from generator), demonstrate the appropriate magnet output for the programmed settings.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
 
Event Description
Information was later received that near the time of the initial event, the patient was undergoing a procedure unrelated to vns when an anesthesiologist noticed some spots on her throat and referred her to an ent physician.The patient saw the ent physician sometime near (b)(6) 2015 and noticed that her vocal cords were not opening or closing like they were supposed to.Patient did not have any symptoms from this event.The ent physician did not take any intervention for this and told patient to come back in 6 months for a checkup.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5118141
MDR Text Key27545407
Report Number1644487-2015-05966
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/05/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/07/2010
Device Model Number102
Device Lot Number200975
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/01/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/03/2015
03/31/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/08/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
-
-