• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST PTA DILATATION CATHETER; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST PTA DILATATION CATHETER; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CQ75104
Device Problems Deflation Problem (1149); Product Quality Problem (1506)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/11/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
No hospital/medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported during a tips procedure, a pta balloon would not deflate after the initial inflation in a portal hepatic shunt.The health care provider reported the balloon was inflated to 15 atms, and inflation/deflation manipulation was performed in an attempt to deflate the balloon, but was unsuccessful.The hcp further reported guided fluoroscopy was used to advance a needle percutaneously to successfully perforate the pta balloon.It was further reported that the device was removed in its entirety, without difficulty, through the sheath.Another pta balloon was reportedly used to complete the procedure.There was no known impact or consequence to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted.The lot met all release criteria.Visual inspection: the device was returned.The balloon size for this product is printed on the balloon hub of the catheter and identified the returned sample as an 10mm x 4cm balloon.No anomalies were noted to the device at this time.Functional/performance evaluation: the patency of the guidewire lumen was tested using an in-house 0.035¿ guidewire, and it passed without issue.An attempt was made to inflate the balloon with water using an in-house device.The balloon leaked during inflation, likely due to the needle stick that the user used to deflate the balloon.The balloon was stripped of its fiber and the location of the reported needle stick was found 6.5cm from the distal tip.The balloon was stripped and cut at the proximal cone to examine the inflation/deflation port.Upon removing the balloon, it was noted that the glue bullet was not in its correct location and was lodged inside the outer catheter shaft.The polyimide was pulled distally to remove the glue bullet from the outer catheter.Upon removal, it appeared that the diameter of the glue bullet was too small, causing it to become lodged inside the outer catheter shaft.Medical records review: as medical records were not provided, a review could not be performed.Image/photo review: no medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.Conclusion: the investigation is inconclusive for deflation issues, as the balloon was unable to be inflated due to the condition in which the sample was returned (i.E.Needle stick).The investigation is confirmed for a product quality issue, as the od of the glue bullet did not meet the minimum required specification, causing the glue bullet to become lodged within the outer catheter shaft.The evaluation found the glue bullet was lodged within the catheter shaft, blocking the inflation/deflation ports.The od of the glue bullet did not meet the minimum required specification of 0.0608", the glue bullet was measured to be 0.0598".The root cause for the glue bullet becoming lodged in the catheter shaft is manufacturing related and likely caused the inflation/deflation issues.Labeling review: the current conquest pta dilatation catheter instructions for use (ifu) provides general instructions for use of the device, as well as warnings, precautions, and potential complications associated with the device.(b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONQUEST PTA DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 west 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V.
blvd montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1625 west 3rd st.
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key5134561
MDR Text Key27832049
Report Number2020394-2015-01671
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K083657
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/14/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCQ75104
Device Lot NumberREZE1173
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/22/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/08/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/18/2015
03/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/27/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient Weight102
-
-