• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TIBIAL NAIL, STANDARD T2 TIBIA Ø10X255 MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TIBIAL NAIL, STANDARD T2 TIBIA Ø10X255 MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 18221025S
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Sticking (1597)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/13/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during t2t extraction surgery, it took a long time to remove an end cap.The end cap could be loosen with a driver, but it did not reach removal.The end cap seemed to stuck to the nail.The surgeon used a conical extractor, pliers and a hummer, and removed the end cap forcibly.After that the surgeon tried to remove the nail, but it could not be removed due to the bone quality of the patient.The surgeon wants the investigation of the thread of the end cap.The primary surgery was performed 3-4 years ago.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: product inquiry stated the end cap t2 tibia +10 mm and the tibial nail, standard t2 tibia ø10x255 mm to be the subject products.No further associated products were reported.The review of the device history records revealed no discrepancies.The affected items were documented as faultless prior to distribution.Thus, we excluded deviations in material and manufacturing.During investigation no material, design or manufacturing related issues were found.Appearance of deformed / stripped off thread flanks and material displacement as well as clear traces of cross-threading indicate that the end cap likely had been inserted under misalignment by considerable force during the initial surgery.The thread of the nail likely was also damaged (same material as the end cap).But this could not be proofed as the nail was still implanted and therefore not available.A functional test of the end cap revealed that the item could be screwed and unscrewed into a sample tibial nail until its desired end position as intended although the thread being damaged.The reported event (¿the end cap could be loosen with a driver, but it did not reach removal.The end cap seemed to stuck to the nail¿) could not be confirmed or reproduced.A deficiency of the end cap in question was not verified.Referring to additional information received the tibial nail could not be explanted due to bone ingrowth.A similar case had been reviewed by a hcp, who stated that ¿removal of an im nail may be challenge, particularly in younger patients with stable bone structure, significant endosteal callus formation, and distinct remodeling¿im nails made from type ii anodized titanium alloy are biologically inert and there is no particular need to remove non-irritated im nails in general, even in young patients.Forced removal of an im nail with bony ingrowth bears a risk of bone damage.This risk should be outweighed against a possible theoretical marginal advantage of nail removal¿¿ in the case that implant removal is required or wished we refer to the extraction kit.In case of request experienced engineers from the manufacturer would assist.With available information and with still implanted item no further technical statement was possible.In case relevant clinical information should become available, we reserve the right to update the investigation and change the root cause.With received information it was suggested that the event was not related to a deficiency of the devices, but was most likely patient related.Review of complaint history, capa databases and risk analysis did not identify any conspicuity.The review of the risk assessment for the failure mode indicated the issue was addressed adequately.There are no actions in place related to the reported event for the subject product.No non-conformity was identified.Device remains implanted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during t2t extraction surgery, it took a long time to remove an end cap.The end cap could be loosen with a driver, but it did not reach removal.The end cap seemed to stuck to the nail.The surgeon used a conical extractor, pliers and a hummer, and removed the end cap forcibly.After that the surgeon tried to remove the nail, but it could not be removed due to the bone quality of the patient.The surgeon wants the investigation of the thread of the end cap.The primary surgery was performed 3-4 years ago.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TIBIAL NAIL, STANDARD T2 TIBIA Ø10X255 MM
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5139932
MDR Text Key28261423
Report Number0009610622-2015-00470
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K003018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 09/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Catalogue Number18221025S
Device Lot NumberK581634
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/09/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age20 YR
-
-